Skip to main content

Home Run King

I almost feel sorry for Barry Bonds.

You can check out the latest steroid allegations in an article on the website of Sports Illustrated.

Barry Bonds used steroids-that's still news? Really?

Okay, I don't really feel bad for Barry-he's obviously responsible for his own steroid use and, as a grown man, was fully aware of what he was doing in taking illegal drugs. This is not a "blame society" piece, in which I show how the expectations of fans created pressures so severe that he just had to take steroids, making the man in the stands the true villian. And it's not a tale of how we build up stars just to tear them down, though that runs throughout the Bonds saga.

Yet Bonds is an interesting case, because if the dates are correct in this story-which suggests Bonds started using steroids out of jealousy springing from the fame of Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa in 1998-he was very clearly an all-time great before he ever cheated.

Somehow Bonds was left off one of baseball's greatest marking gimmicks of recent years, the All-Century Team, a fact that becomes ever more hilarious as time goes on. Bonds, not one of the best players of the last century? Please. By 1999, when the team was named, Stan Musial and Ted Williams were the only leftfielders who could claim to be on Bonds' level, and Musial's grasp was slipping fast. (Of course, in typical all-star fashion, the All-Century Team grouped centerfielders, left fielders and the men in right together into one imaginary position).

Two quotes from the article (which is actually an article about the book excerpt which will run in this week's SI) stood out to me. The first said,

For instance, the authors write that by 2001, when Bonds broke Mark McGwire's single-season home-run record (70) by belting 73, Bonds was using two designer steroids referred to as the Cream and the Clear, as well as insulin, human growth hormone, testosterone decanoate (a fast-acting steroid known as Mexican beans) and trenbolone, a steroid created to improve the muscle quality of cattle.

The muscle quality of cattle? The man risked turning himself into livestock for our attention? Sad that he thought it would work; sadder still that it did. Can you even concieve of considering that? Second:

According to the book, Bonds, in comments to his mistress, Kimberly Bell, often dismissed McGwire with racially-charged remarks such as, "They're just letting him do it because he's a white boy." But Bonds looked at McGwire and his hulking physique and decided he needed to dramatically increase his muscle mass to compete with him.

That actually sounds like a pretty good point. Of course, Sammy Sosa got a pretty free ride as well, and not only is his skin dark, he's not even American. So whether "they" are major league baseball or just the sports media, race wasn't the only reason McGwire got a free ride compared to Bonds. A bigger reason, of course, is that Barry Bonds is a jerk to reporters. It's unfortunate that so much of our public perception of athletes is based on how they treat journalists-yet once the star fades, we eventually find out the sad truth about our fallen idols. Does anyone think of Sosa as anything but a con man today?

I also worry about the damage baseball has done to itself by allowing the game for so long to drift away from timely scoring into full-blown offensive fireworks. It was a great temporary fix and threw the sport back into the spotlight during the summer of 1998. But increased scoring lengthens the games and draws further attention to the tedium of pickoff throws and hitters stepping out of the batter's box.

Besides, home runs are only exciting when they're rare. Have you seen baseball highlights the last few years? It's home run, home run, home run, and a weak pop-out to end the game. Lather, rinse, repeat. Home runs aren't that fun to watch outside of the game context-each one looks the same. Isn't a late-game strikeout or a properly-executed double play a more dazzling display of athletic skill? Even high-scoring games can be competitive and exciting, but baseball is fast losing its youthful beauty.

Comments

Mike said…
I think the biggest reasons no one slams McGwire are that a) everyone liked him in the first place, while no one liked Bonds and b) he's not playing any more. It'll be really fun when he comes up on the Hall of Fame ballot, though.

You're right, Sosa was never blasted the way Bonds was. But Sosa never held the home run record, either. And if he was on steroids in addition to corking his bat and still couldn't break the records-well, that's even worse.

Of course, no one went after McGwire when he was playing-except for andro, which isn't technically a steroid-so it's a complicated issue.

I like your take on Selig, but even more, I'm thrilled with how the players look in this. Basically every player-at least every good player-from the last ten to fifteen years has a huge cloud of suspicion over everything they accomplished. And that's what they get for siding with a short-sighted union that always valued dollars and bargaining position over what should have been more pressing concerns, like the long-term health of its members. Talk about having no sense of the people who will come after you! And baseball-the one sport that really treats its legends like, well, legends-will never hold them in that same lofty position.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...