Skip to main content

Home Run King

I almost feel sorry for Barry Bonds.

You can check out the latest steroid allegations in an article on the website of Sports Illustrated.

Barry Bonds used steroids-that's still news? Really?

Okay, I don't really feel bad for Barry-he's obviously responsible for his own steroid use and, as a grown man, was fully aware of what he was doing in taking illegal drugs. This is not a "blame society" piece, in which I show how the expectations of fans created pressures so severe that he just had to take steroids, making the man in the stands the true villian. And it's not a tale of how we build up stars just to tear them down, though that runs throughout the Bonds saga.

Yet Bonds is an interesting case, because if the dates are correct in this story-which suggests Bonds started using steroids out of jealousy springing from the fame of Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa in 1998-he was very clearly an all-time great before he ever cheated.

Somehow Bonds was left off one of baseball's greatest marking gimmicks of recent years, the All-Century Team, a fact that becomes ever more hilarious as time goes on. Bonds, not one of the best players of the last century? Please. By 1999, when the team was named, Stan Musial and Ted Williams were the only leftfielders who could claim to be on Bonds' level, and Musial's grasp was slipping fast. (Of course, in typical all-star fashion, the All-Century Team grouped centerfielders, left fielders and the men in right together into one imaginary position).

Two quotes from the article (which is actually an article about the book excerpt which will run in this week's SI) stood out to me. The first said,

For instance, the authors write that by 2001, when Bonds broke Mark McGwire's single-season home-run record (70) by belting 73, Bonds was using two designer steroids referred to as the Cream and the Clear, as well as insulin, human growth hormone, testosterone decanoate (a fast-acting steroid known as Mexican beans) and trenbolone, a steroid created to improve the muscle quality of cattle.

The muscle quality of cattle? The man risked turning himself into livestock for our attention? Sad that he thought it would work; sadder still that it did. Can you even concieve of considering that? Second:

According to the book, Bonds, in comments to his mistress, Kimberly Bell, often dismissed McGwire with racially-charged remarks such as, "They're just letting him do it because he's a white boy." But Bonds looked at McGwire and his hulking physique and decided he needed to dramatically increase his muscle mass to compete with him.

That actually sounds like a pretty good point. Of course, Sammy Sosa got a pretty free ride as well, and not only is his skin dark, he's not even American. So whether "they" are major league baseball or just the sports media, race wasn't the only reason McGwire got a free ride compared to Bonds. A bigger reason, of course, is that Barry Bonds is a jerk to reporters. It's unfortunate that so much of our public perception of athletes is based on how they treat journalists-yet once the star fades, we eventually find out the sad truth about our fallen idols. Does anyone think of Sosa as anything but a con man today?

I also worry about the damage baseball has done to itself by allowing the game for so long to drift away from timely scoring into full-blown offensive fireworks. It was a great temporary fix and threw the sport back into the spotlight during the summer of 1998. But increased scoring lengthens the games and draws further attention to the tedium of pickoff throws and hitters stepping out of the batter's box.

Besides, home runs are only exciting when they're rare. Have you seen baseball highlights the last few years? It's home run, home run, home run, and a weak pop-out to end the game. Lather, rinse, repeat. Home runs aren't that fun to watch outside of the game context-each one looks the same. Isn't a late-game strikeout or a properly-executed double play a more dazzling display of athletic skill? Even high-scoring games can be competitive and exciting, but baseball is fast losing its youthful beauty.

Comments

Mike said…
I think the biggest reasons no one slams McGwire are that a) everyone liked him in the first place, while no one liked Bonds and b) he's not playing any more. It'll be really fun when he comes up on the Hall of Fame ballot, though.

You're right, Sosa was never blasted the way Bonds was. But Sosa never held the home run record, either. And if he was on steroids in addition to corking his bat and still couldn't break the records-well, that's even worse.

Of course, no one went after McGwire when he was playing-except for andro, which isn't technically a steroid-so it's a complicated issue.

I like your take on Selig, but even more, I'm thrilled with how the players look in this. Basically every player-at least every good player-from the last ten to fifteen years has a huge cloud of suspicion over everything they accomplished. And that's what they get for siding with a short-sighted union that always valued dollars and bargaining position over what should have been more pressing concerns, like the long-term health of its members. Talk about having no sense of the people who will come after you! And baseball-the one sport that really treats its legends like, well, legends-will never hold them in that same lofty position.

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...