Skip to main content

Yesterdays how quick they change—oh, lost and long-gone now

Yesterday was another proud day for the fat cats of college football.

The No. 2-ranked University of Texas Longhorns eked out a narrow 64-7 victory at home over UTEP. The No. 8 Boise State Broncos destroyed 1-3 Bowling Green 49-14. And No. 16 Oklahoma State devoured Grambling State’s defense to the tune of 587 yards in a 56-6 win.

You could say that the sham that is college football’s championship system encourages this kind of junk. (It’s often said that a team could lose on any given week and lose its shot at the national title. While that’s literally true, many of these matchups are like the U.S. Navy going against, I don’t know, the Antarctic Imperial Guard or something.)

Of course, the whole season won’t be that easy. Texas and Oklahoma State have to play each other, for starters, and of course the Longhorns have that Red River Shootout every year. Boise State will have to…well, actually, their schedule’s kinda easy, but you know what I mean.

I can’t help but think of these early-season tune-ups when I consider the Denver Broncos’ 3-0 start, extended today with an always-welcome 23-3 shellacking of the Oakland Raiders.

In some ways, the Broncos look outstanding: three straight wins with a brand-new coach and quarterback, an offense with an emerging ground game that seems to get a little more into the groove every week, and a defense that has given up a piddling sixteen points in three games.

On the other: who have they beaten? The Cincinnati Bengals, whom we beat with the flukiest of victories, are the only impressive silhouette under the cockpit. The Raiders are pretty horrible, and young JaMarcus Russell is really struggling. The Browns, well, the Browns will always be one of my favorite teams to see across the field. Not to be a jerk, but they’re basically still an expansion team, aren’t they?

The Broncos will be tested very soon, with upcoming home games against the Dallas Cowboys and New England Patriots. (Even if those teams aren’t as good as their reputations, surely they represent legitimate NFL challenges.) Then it’s road games against the Chargers and Ravens, and a home date with the defending champion Steelers. Would anyone be shocked if we’re 4-4 in a few weeks? On the other hand, if we can defend the home turf the next two weeks…at some point a team builds an impressive lead and it doesn’t so much matter if they’re really that good. But I don’t want to think too far ahead. For now, let us pause and give thanks that our offseason of disaster hasn’t prevented a wonderful start to the season.

Comments

John said…
3-0 is a great start, and completely unexpected from my end. The defense has looked very stingy, and the running game has impressed me enormously.

The next four games will be telling - I won't be surprised if we come through 4-4, but will be very happy if we make it through 5-3.
blaine said…
I have also been impressed with the Broncos so far. The Raiders really struggle on offense, but they do have a pretty good defense and the Broncos were able to move the ball with ease yesterday. I was glad to see Marshall finally get involved in the game; he has to be one of the best receivers in the league going over the middle.

I think they can beat the Cowboys this week. They are overrated as usual. What has Tony Homo EVER done besides lose every meaningful game he's ever played in? He showed last week that if you can put a little pressure on him he will make mistakes.

How much is Blue Suede Dumervil loving the new 3-4 defense? He's been terrific so far this year!
David said…
yeah, i'm very happy to be where we are right now, and am glad we aren't 0-3.

but i find myself asking the same question you did, who have we beaten?

AT the same time... a lesser defense would've given up more points to mediocre teams, right? we're winning the games we're supposed to, and the defense is working.

i remain, "cautiously optimistic."
Mike said…
John, 5-3 would be pretty acceptable, and .400 against some good teams isn't hard to picture. We have some more tough games in the second half of the season, but we're also still in the AFC West, so not all is lost.

Blaine, that looked pretty crass because I hadn't seen it in a while, but man, I miss Drew Bledsoe's blog. The Broncos did move the ball pretty well against the Raiders. Not perfectly, but well, and it's reasonable to expect all the new faces to work better together as the year goes on. Elvis is having a wonderful year and I'm thrilled to see it.

David, always good to have you, and I agree that the Broncos are looking very good against these teams. They could be playing close games, but they're not. We would need to play better to beat the Saints or something but we're looking good for this point in the season.

Popular posts from this blog

The NFL hates you.

It's no joke. It seems like the more devoted of a fan you are, the less the league cares about your continued patronage. The best example is the league's blackout policy, a wonderful gift from the league to its teams granting them added market pressure to charge whatever ridiculous amount they want for tickets. If a game doesn't sell out, the home market doesn't get to watch it on TV. (Basically, a 75-mile radius around the stadium doesn't get to see the game on TV if all the tickets aren’t bought first.) The NFL, like a needy girlfriend, says, "Hey, fans, you like us? Prove it." Then the league asks us to prove it again and again, week after week, year after year. I live within 75 miles of what should be John Elway Stadium, but Broncos fans are pretty much shielded from this stuff, right? Not all of them. One of my friends is as supportive a fan as the NFL can have: he's a Broncos season ticket holder and an NFL Sunday Ticket subscriber. That mean...

Super Bowl XLVI revealed!

The Patriots and the Giants. Things just work out sometimes. * * * Two new teams, the England Patriots and the York Giants, will play for the NFL title in Super Bowl Forty-Six in two weeks. I can't wait. The matchup comes too late, and after too imperfect of a season, to make up for the wounds inflicted by the Giants in early 2008. The Patriots' undefeated season, a 16-0 masterpiece in which they set the league's single-season scoring record, broke at the hands of the upstart Giants in that year's Super Bowl. The way the Giants won made their win feel especially flukish...Eli Manning, known more for his entitled attitude than his athleticism (the only player to which his moves have ever been compared favorably is his brother Peyton), somehow scrambled free of a Patriot pass rush in the closing minutes, and lofted a pass down the middle of the field to David Tyree, who caught the key throw against the top of his helmet. Then a touchdown pass to Plexiglass provided the wi...

An innocent mistake

Sorry. Here I am to catch up on a few things from the past week... 1. Vince Young will be on the cover of Madden 08. Good for him, I guess. Much is made of the Madden curse. It's not a self-fulfilling prophecy, but it almost feels like one. The real problem is that a) football is a very violent game, and b) Electronic Arts typically selects a cover athlete who's already very well-known. Unfortunately, the players are therefore often a year (Shaun Alexander) or more (Ray Lewis) off their actual prime, and old enough that a serious injury is more likely. Young is an up-and-comer, and to avoid a horrible pun let's just say he has less age than most of those guys. I think he'll be fine. 2. Of course, the reason EA went with such a youthful player is that superstar Chargers back LaDainian Tomlinson turned them down . Why? Money. No surprise that'd be a point of contention, considering how "generous" EA is with its regular employees . 3. That's why re...