Skip to main content

Another week in review

Wow, times flies when you don't have anything to blog about. Or, more accurately, when you're sidelined with what the sports world calls "flu-like symptoms".

Now I'm feeling great, thanks to some rest, my mom, and the culinary brilliance of Chili's To Go. What did I miss?

1. The Final Four were chosen. Called out from among mere men, the Final Four rose forth, shaking the Earth in their illustrious...sorry. I mean, I really have been inside too long.

Florida. Georgetown. Ohio State. UCLA. Who had them picked? I didn't, but it's not hard to imagine that thousands of fans did. Georgetown is the closest to being a surprise, but even they were a No. 2 seed in an up-for-grabs regional. John, go ahead and tell us you had Georgetown making it this far. Seriously. We're dying to know. (As you can see, I'm not bitter at all. Actually, I'm...well, I'll get to that at No. 2. Suffice it to say I have still never won an NCAA tournment contest of any kind.)

I think the lineup of teams is interesting, but I don't think it's too meaningful either way. My first post on this blog was about how sick I was of hearing about Cinderella teams, many of whom lose big after that inspiring two-game winning streak into the Sweet Sixteen. In a way, it's nice to see great teams taking every spot. Hopefully, it means there are three great games left to go.

Of course, the novelty of an unknown on the national stage is a nice thing too. Is it going away? The pessimist could argue that the new professional age limit is really only going to help major programs, who can now feature players that in years past would have already been in the NBA. I don't think this is true now, but it's possible.

I'm just glad college basketball lets the small schools play on the same floor as the big ones. They could just scrap the tournament altogether and let the most-hyped squads play in exhibitions two months after the season, you know.

2. Actually, I'm...(cont.) not that upset about North Carolina's tourney loss. Maybe I'm getting soft. Maybe it's that they won it all so recently, and the shot at another title so soon felt like a gift anyway. Or maybe the Tar Heels just completely fell apart and have no one to blame but themselves.

Georgetown dominated them down the stretch, and the Tar Heels were happy to play along, taking horrible shots and ignoring their post men in the halfcourt. They choked, but they probably weren't really contenders to begin with. Like the 2005-06 Broncos, I got too excited, but the titles would have been a little unexpected anyway. They didn't lose on a bad call or anything. I can live with that.

The part about it that really bothered me was a trash-talking phone call from a friend who recently became an N.C. State fan. (Don't ask me why.) Something about how the Tar Heels always fold under pressure, especially Tyler Hansbrough, who was only the game's leading scorer with 26 points and matched Hoya Roy "Julius" Hibbert's game-high 11 boards. Hansbrough's not my favorite player or anything, but geez, what do you want from him?

You're right, though, it's not as good as finishing tenth in a 12-team conference or nabbing that 6 seed in the NIT.

3. Broncos sign Dre Bly. Man, this post is getting long. So the Broncos signed Dre Bly to a seemingly reasonable five-year, $33 million deal. (By the way, the linked article is incredibly short, but I'm hopeful the Denver Post will fix it overnight before you read this.)

Is the NFL's free agency spending spree over? I don't know. I can't make sense of the deals under the new cap. $33 million still sounds like a ton of money for a No. 2 corner. But I'm glad he's signed, happy the distraction's gone, and I'm looking forward to seeing what a gambler can do opposite a Champ.

Comments

David said…
I'm looking forward to seeing what a gambler can do opposite a Champ

kenny rogers is playing opposite of champ? now this i gotta see
Bro T said…
Somebody is Raleigh has a Basketball Jones?
Mike said…
Ouch. But yeah, he does.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Orange Julius

All right, class, what kind of things do we look for in an NBA draftee? A player who's proven, or one with oodles of upside? A guy coming off a spectacular college career, or one coming off the bench for his Serbian club team? A player who's shown constant improvement, or one who mysteriously fared worse as a senior than a junior? No, Kiki, put your hand down, it's the first answer to each of these questions, not the second. Yesterday the Nuggets picked 20th in the first round, selecting Julius Hodge, shooting guard/small forward, out of North Carolina State. College fans will immediately recognize his name, as Hodge was the ACC Player of the Year as a junior. Unfortunately, he just finished his senior year, which was marked mostly by a dip in his scoring numbers (he developed a sudden inability to hit free throws or threes) and a punch to the groin by Wake Forest guard Chris Paul. Hodge is mostly a mid-range and slashing-type scorer, kind of like the more-than-sufficient s...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...