Skip to main content

Screw Carmelo

If Carmelo Anthony wants out so badly, let’s make him stay.

I used to think the Nuggets should keep Carmelo for the whole year since having Carmelo gives us our best shot at a championship for the foreseeable future. (Not that it’s an especially good shot.) But now? Let’s just keep him out of pure vengeance.

Recent rumors suggested Carmelo would only sign his extension with the Nuggets if they trade him to New York. Here’s how it works: in the NBA, a player’s current team can offer a guy more money than any other team. This is intended to give teams a fighting chance in free agency to hold on to their best players. But if Carmelo wants out of Denver so badly, let him go! I can’t see a single reason for the Nuggets to give him the max deal if he’s not going to play here.

Well, there is one reason, and that’s if we can trade Carmelo for something truly worthwhile. That’s unlikely. We could probably get some projects, or maybe one good player and some stiffs, for Carmelo, which isn’t close to fair. Neither trade possibility is inherently more favorable than just getting the salary cap space, and neither gives the team the sweet satisfaction of watching the door smack Anthony on his way out.

Some would say the team is better off without Carmelo anyway, as we haven’t won anything with him (mostly true) and he’ll never win a championship anyway (unknowable). I agree that Anthony is unlikely to be the cornerstone of a dynasty, but could he win a ring? You bet. History has many examples of swingman scorers who led a team to a title: Rick Barry, Dwyane Wade, and Paul Pierce come to mind. He’d probably need a higher caliber of teammate than, say, a young Shaq required to bring home a ring, but he could do it.

Anthony’s denied the report that he would accept a trade only to New York (though I still think he ends up with the Knicks), but the principle stands. He’s not a free agent, so he doesn’t get to pick his team, and that’s that.

Unless the Nuggets are truly blown away by a trade offer, I say let him walk. Let him play in New York for less money. It won’t crush the franchise the way the Mutombo departure did. Simply put, there’s no way the team’s braintrust is as dumb as it was in the mid-90s. Mutombo was just one in an epic list of mistakes back then. If Carmelo leaves, we’ll survive, and he’ll just have to film more ads to make ends meet.

Hey, I’ll miss the guy. But if he doesn’t want to play for the Nuggets any longer, let’s not do him any favors.

Comments

blaine said…
I've been waiting for 6 months for this post...

I've finally accepted that Carmelo Anthony will not be a Nugget for long. I was holding out hope despite all the evidence suggesting otherwise. I've watched most of the Nuggets' games this year and I've noticed that with Lawson, Afflalo, and J.R. all playing much better this season that the Nuggets can be a pretty good team (maybe even a playoff team) without Melo.

I think the Nuggets' would be better off making some kind of trade during the season for two reasons. One, because then we at least get something in return. I want the Nuggets to make a trade with the Nets, not because of Favors, but to get some good draft picks and then Melo will have to play the rest of the season with one of the worst teams in the league (would that satisfy your vengeful appetite Mike?).

The other reason to make a trade would be to start to develop some cohesion on a team that for 6-7 years has been required to get Melo 25+ shots a night. Certainly without Melo demanding the ball every other possession it will be a lot easier to get to the 20+ assist totals Karl is always harping about.

I love how Melo is suddenly the leading rebounder for the Nuggets this season...at least we now know he CAN rebound if he needs to (even if for his own selfish reasons).

I certainly won't miss all of Melo's whining and technical fouls that he accrues on a nightly basis. Still, it has been fun to have a player of his caliber on our team but I will be rooting hard against the Knicks come next season!
John said…
I hate to see Melo's talent go - but his departure has been a long time coming.

I would not completely close the door on a trade, because we may get some value in return, which is always better than nothing. Even the Cavaliers did a sign-and-trade with LeBron after "The Decision," which has to be history's most shameful example of dissing a franchise. I would love to see us pick up a tough insider defender/rebounder if we can get one, although picks also would be nice.
Mike said…
My point's just that getting something isn't good enough, and I sort of ignored the prospect of getting good draft picks, which is our best bet. When I heard rumors about guys like Joakim Noah and Luol Deng, I was disheartened; even though Deng can play, I'd rather pick a guy from scratch who fits our system: let's get someone we want, rather than someone. I think that with the limits of time and money "something" is not always better than nothing. I hated watching us waste time waiting for the Tskitishvilis of the world to develop. I'm frustrated by the prospect of picking up another team's junk, though perhaps I am overly pessimistic.

I like your Nets idea because yes, sticking him on a bad team is great, but they won't want him without the extension already signed.
Mike said…
John, you're right about the Cavs, and I was surprised when they did it considering how bitter the owner seemed about LeBron.

I don't know, just looking at Noah's numbers I guess he's not bad, too, I just can't stand the guy.
Garrett Holtz said…
I stumbled upon this blog and scrolled down and noticed this article. It's funny looking back on something like this months later. At that time I felt that the Nuggets wouldn't get anything of worth in a Melo trade. I was wrong, and it appears I wasn't the only one. The Nuggets got pretty much the best haul possible in the deal, and actually played better without Melo for the rest of the regular season. In retrospect, dealing with the Nets only amped up what the Knicks were willing to offer us, including Timofey Mozgov in the deal, who could start next season for Denver. All said and done, the Nuggets built for their future with this trade, and now Ty Lawson and Danilo Gallinari can be the young cornerstones of the franshise. Interested in more Nuggets' articles. Check out:
nuggetsfandom.blogspot.com
Garrett Holtz said…
This comment has been removed by the author.

Popular posts from this blog

The NFL hates you.

It's no joke. It seems like the more devoted of a fan you are, the less the league cares about your continued patronage. The best example is the league's blackout policy, a wonderful gift from the league to its teams granting them added market pressure to charge whatever ridiculous amount they want for tickets. If a game doesn't sell out, the home market doesn't get to watch it on TV. (Basically, a 75-mile radius around the stadium doesn't get to see the game on TV if all the tickets aren’t bought first.) The NFL, like a needy girlfriend, says, "Hey, fans, you like us? Prove it." Then the league asks us to prove it again and again, week after week, year after year. I live within 75 miles of what should be John Elway Stadium, but Broncos fans are pretty much shielded from this stuff, right? Not all of them. One of my friends is as supportive a fan as the NFL can have: he's a Broncos season ticket holder and an NFL Sunday Ticket subscriber. That mean...

An innocent mistake

Sorry. Here I am to catch up on a few things from the past week... 1. Vince Young will be on the cover of Madden 08. Good for him, I guess. Much is made of the Madden curse. It's not a self-fulfilling prophecy, but it almost feels like one. The real problem is that a) football is a very violent game, and b) Electronic Arts typically selects a cover athlete who's already very well-known. Unfortunately, the players are therefore often a year (Shaun Alexander) or more (Ray Lewis) off their actual prime, and old enough that a serious injury is more likely. Young is an up-and-comer, and to avoid a horrible pun let's just say he has less age than most of those guys. I think he'll be fine. 2. Of course, the reason EA went with such a youthful player is that superstar Chargers back LaDainian Tomlinson turned them down . Why? Money. No surprise that'd be a point of contention, considering how "generous" EA is with its regular employees . 3. That's why re...

Super Bowl XLVI revealed!

The Patriots and the Giants. Things just work out sometimes. * * * Two new teams, the England Patriots and the York Giants, will play for the NFL title in Super Bowl Forty-Six in two weeks. I can't wait. The matchup comes too late, and after too imperfect of a season, to make up for the wounds inflicted by the Giants in early 2008. The Patriots' undefeated season, a 16-0 masterpiece in which they set the league's single-season scoring record, broke at the hands of the upstart Giants in that year's Super Bowl. The way the Giants won made their win feel especially flukish...Eli Manning, known more for his entitled attitude than his athleticism (the only player to which his moves have ever been compared favorably is his brother Peyton), somehow scrambled free of a Patriot pass rush in the closing minutes, and lofted a pass down the middle of the field to David Tyree, who caught the key throw against the top of his helmet. Then a touchdown pass to Plexiglass provided the wi...