Skip to main content

Broncos get a coach!

The Denver Broncos have hired Josh McDaniels, an assistant member of the New England Patriots' disgraced coaching staff, as their new head coach. For more details on the man, see McDaniels' Wikipedia page. If I'm reading it right, McDaniels had a different job during each of New England's Super Bowl-winning seasons, serving as a personnel assistant, defensive coaching assistant, and quarterbacks coach. That's not quite the same as being a "head coach" or "offensive coordinator" during that time, you know, though he did serve in the second capacity during New England's most recent Super Bowl appearance, a loss in which the team's vaunted, record-breaking offense scored just 14 points.

Of course, one reason the Broncos went with such a young coach—McDaniels is 32, which means we probably had some of the same toys as kids—is that they still have eight figures in obligations to their living legend, the recently-terminated Mike Shanahan.

Yeah, next season's going to be great.

To be fair, he got fifty touchdown passes out of Tom Brady last season, not that I have any interest in being fair.

Comments

blaine said…
I was surprised when I heard they hired McDaniels. I still think they should have looked at someone with a little more experience. To my knowledge Jim Fassel is still available. However, the Broncos clearly weren't interested in interviewing candidates with previous head coaching experience.

I think in order for McDaniels to have a chance at having any success with the Broncos that Pat Bowlen will need to hire a good GM and a good Defensive Coordinator. At least we know that McDaniels will be skilled at the art of inconspicuous video taping of his opponents.
8:37 AM
Mike said…
Jim Fassel? Marty Schottenheimer? Blaine, where do you come up with these guys?
9:06 AM
John said…
I was worried we were going to hir this guy, and not only becuase we owe Shanny the GDP of Denmark over the next few years. McDaniels strikes me as the safe but uninspiring pick: there has been so much hype around the Patriots and their offense that some has invariably rubbed off of him, so guys like Sean Salisbury can claim they knew about him all along. But, unsurprisingly, I disagree with the conventional wisdom here: based on what I have seen, Patriots assistants have not been working out all that well as head coaches (see Crennel, Weis, and Mangini), and I have no real reason to think McDaniels will be much different.

Besides, isn't our problem player personnel decisions? And how does this help us there?

Jim Fassel and Marty Schottenheimer? I couldn't think of two more undeserving retreads. What are you thinking, Blaine? Particularly in the case of Schottenheimer - he has made his career out of losing to the Broncos, not beating them.
10:15 AM
blaine said…
Why is everyone opposed to a proven winner? Schottenheimer has had a winning record with every team where he has been the head coach. For his career he's won over 60% of the games he's coached and his overall record is 200-126 (in the regular season).

The point is moot considering the Broncos have already made their decision, and I'm not saying that Marty was the right man for the job. I just think his record at least warrants an interview with the Broncos.
11:49 AM
Mike said…
Golly, Blaine, you're right. Wait, what did you say his playoff record was? 5-13? You realize the man was on the wrong side of The Drive, right?

John, I agree about the hype, and that was more or less my point of pointing out his job titles: he wasn't the critical in the glory days, and when he was o-coord, the team collapsed in the Super Bowl.
11:56 AM
David said…
agree with the retread comments. us denver sports folk love this tactic (see rockies, nuggets). something about the thin air must translate to frugality.

but seriously, mcdaniels must be one hell of an interviewer. i'm disappointed with the pick.

what happened to defense? freak, this move does nothing.
12:14 PM
John said…
if Marty Schottenheimer was such a proven winner, why hasn't anyone else hired him in the two years he has been out of the game? The 60% winning percentage in the regular season v. 5-13 in the playoffs tells you all you need to know - the guy gets on good teams and then chokes on "Marty Ball" in the playoffs.

Mike: That was exactly my point about the hype. It is more important that Chris Berman talks about you on air than it is that you haven't gotten it done.

DP: I had the same thought about the defense. Do we not even care about that side of the ball anymore?
4:14 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...
47 comments
Read more

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...
19 comments
Read more

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...
2 comments
Read more