Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Olympics' first week

I woke up early this morning to watch the U.S. beat Spain live in basketball, one of the few live events I've seen this year. (Which reminds me, I screwed up again on the 200 IM, accidentally checking Phelps' Wikipedia page for his career medals breakdown before the race was shown live in Mountain time. Thanks again, NBC!)

Anyway, the Americans—or Redeem Team, as they are so cutely called this year—dominated the Spaniards with superior athletic ability. Fittingly, Coach K had us looking like a Duke team, except like one from the late-90's, when they were good: they combined pressure defense and exquisite ball movement. Carmelo continued his torrid shooting with four threes, and Dwyane Wade especially continued his great play. LeBron James was good today but overall my opinion of him is almost down...he's still a little too prone to the what-the-heck-are-you-doing-type plays where he pulls up for a three when it's far from the best shot. However, he pulls some of them off, too, and has had some sick blocks already in the tourney. It has been a blast watching the U.S. team and I feel much better about our gold medal chances.

I watched the team competition in women's gymnastics, but not the individual all-around. After watching Nastia Liukin in the team competition I wasn't remotely surpised by her gold medal win; she was awesome under pressure. Even though I couldn't care much less for her sport it's always cool watching people come through like that. I felt bad for the telegenic Alicia Sacramone, who hurt the U.S. team when she fell off the balance beam, but as a fan was kind of annoyed by how rattled she was by it. I almost knew she'd make a big mistake on the next event, the floor exercise, where she fell again. For once, though, I was grateful for the tape delay, because I checked online to make sure we were just getting silver, then immediately went to bed. I also realized that by the next Olympics I will be way too old to call even the older gymnasts attractive ever again.

Does anyone remember the quote-unquote scandal of the American track-and-field guys showboating in Athens? Shawn Crawford and Justin Gatlin were winning the 100m semifinals, and one of them (I think Crawford) turned to the other one and started waving at him to go by. NBC announcer and former Denver Nuggets forward Tom Hammond laid into them for what I guess he thought was bad sportsmanship, but which I thought was just two guys fired up in the moment. Anyway, so tonight in the 100m final Usain Bolt slowed near the end to celebrate early, too, spreading his arms out and thumping his chest. I didn't hear a single negative word about it, nor did I want to. Combined with the public perception of the last few Dream Teams, it made me wonder, do Americans hold each other to a higher standard, and if they do, isn't that kind of stupid?

I can't decide whether I liked or hated the swimming announcers. On one hand, I liked the insight and how they were willing to make predictions, or tell me that some team leading a relay didn't really have a chance because the rest of their team was weak or whatever. And they were always right on that stuff. However, they had this weird way of trying to manage my expectations that felt annoying. Outside of Phelps, I liked watching the whole U.S. men's team and the women, too, at least when Katie Hoff wasn't cranking her goggles tight an inch deep into her skull. I especially liked watching Dara Torres, who first competed in the L.A. Olympics (!) and almost won gold in the 50m free tonight. It's cool to see a veteran getting it done like that.

Microsoft Silverlight, the plug-in for watching video on NBC's Olympic website, slowed my work and home desktops to a crawl and delivered intermittent choppiness on both streaming events and replays. The framerate smoothed out on my MacBook under both Vista and OS X, so there is hope if buying a new computer just for the Olympics makes sense to you. Still, I got the sense that the video experience was precisely engineered to be watchable, but also just bad enough that TV would always be preferable. I am pretty glad to be able to catch some stuff live, though. I hope in 2010 things look better and we can watch everything live.

NBC, on the whole, has been awful so far. The tape delay is absolutely killing me, and I saw the results to the men's 100m track final today about fifteen times on the Internet before it was televised. As always I love the replay of that race from the camera that glides alongside them...that always looks so epic. But for nights when I could be watching Michael Phelps live, but instead am stuck hearing about the mating habits of panda bears, I give out only one grade: F-.

Comments

blaine said…
It's a relief to see the USA Men's basketball team actually playing some defense. I think that reason alone will allow them to win the gold this year. I don't think they have had to even run a single offensive set play because it seems like they steal the ball every time the oppenent has the ball and go down for a break-away dunk. (I'm a little surprised the announcers haven't called out the American players for show-boating on some of their dunks.) Melo looked good on offense yesterday, but I thought his defense (as usual) looked suspect. He looks like he just gets really frustrated when his opponent beats him and then he committs a stupid foul.

I think it's crazy that, as you stated, Bolt slowed down to celebrate and STILL set a world record! That guy is ridiculous.

I agree on NBC's coverage. By the way, who is that woman they bring in for their Olympic Special that has a deeper voice than I do. I can't stand to listen to her. As soon as she comes on I have to change the channel until she's finished.
Mike said…
I was a little surprised by our willingness to run up the score...Tayshaun Prince hit a three in the closing minute and I'm like, is that entirely necessary? A real flashback to Church ball, where the winning time has to attempt a completely superfluous three at the end of every game. For some watching Prince reminded me to foul the crap out of anyone who does that this year.

Bolt was amazing! That one announcer kept saying he may have thrown away a 9.59...I really wish he would have kept it up and really lowered that record.

And are you talking about Mary Carillo?

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...