Skip to main content

I mean, I really hate the A.L.

That is all.

Comments

John said…
Who watches the All-Star game anyway? It's an interminable bore. At least Selig didn't have to call it for lack of available pitchers.
8:09 AM
Mike said…
I missed most of it being at a church activity last night, but two people told me I needed to check it out, so I had the TV on for the last few innings. I have to admit that baseball does drama in a way few other sports can. It's kind of weird how the no-clock thing makes the game feel when it's close and late. Unfortunately, if you actually follow baseball closely, you also end up watching a ton of games that aren't really interesting at all. Or maybe I just think that because games used to get so out of hand at Coors Field...
8:25 AM
blaine said…
I actually really enjoyed this year's All-Star game, although I admit I was really only watching to see how Holliday and Cook would play, it turned out to be a great game.

I was ecstatic to see Holliday hit that homer (even if all it really did was increase his trade value) and Cook was awesome for 3 innings. The game was nearly over in the 11th when Cook was able to get consecutive batters to hit ground balls right to Dan Uggla and he committed errors both times allowing 2 men on with no outs. Then Hurdle (I'm not sure why) had Cook intentionally walk the next batter to load the bases. With the bases loaded with no outs in an all-star game against some of the games best hitters, Cook was able to get three consecutive outs. That was awesome.
8:26 AM
Pat in Colorado said…
The intentional walk was to set up a force play at home, knowing Cook is a groud ball pitcher. And it worked perfectly twice.
9:04 AM
Pat in Colorado said…
ground ball, that is.
9:14 AM
Mike said…
Nice, Pat. I'm sure that's exactly what it was.

And yeah, that Uggla guy had a great game.
10:02 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...
11 comments
Read more

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...
13 comments
Read more

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...
2 comments
Read more