Skip to main content

NBA Playoffs Preview

The Eastern Conference

So far, I've been wrong about the Boston Celtics. They've been fantastic this year, finishing 66-16 and outscoring opponents by more than ten points a game. Only three other teams have a home record better than Boston's road record. The Celtics finished seven games ahead of the No. 2 seed; seven games are all that separates No. 1 from No. 8 in the West. Assuming they stay healthy, they should make the Finals. (Having said all that, I completely disagree with the Sports Guy, who said Kevin Garnett deserves the MVP award.)

Other potential contenders include the Detroit Pistons, who at 59-23 also had a better record than anyone out West. They have the second-best point differential in the league behind Boston. Because they've been together so long, they've been overlooked all year. The Eastern Conference Finals should be sweet, but I still think Boston is better. The Celtics won the season series with the Pistons 2-1.

Cleveland and Orlando are interesting, but there's not enough talent around their respective stars for these teams to be considered realistic contenders.

My winner? The Celtics.

The Western Conference

The West has been run by the Spurs, Mavericks, and, to a lesser extent, the Suns the last few years. But there's been turnover at the top. The Spurs captured the number three seed, but the Suns and Mavericks will start on the road as the respective 6 and 7 seeds.

Instead the top seed is the L.A. Lakers, whose star demanded a trade before the season because he, like all of us, assumed the team would struggle. Instead this Lakers squad looks like Kobe Bryant's best chance yet to silence his critics. But he's still a lone wolf because his supporting cast is flawed (and because he runs Hall of Famers out of town). Good thing Kobe's durable and smart enough to stay out of foul trouble, because no one else can carry the offense for long if he's out. And though the Lakers haven't been this good for a while, remember that Kobe is one of the very small number of stars who have proven they can handle championship pressure.

No. 2 is the New Orleans Hornets. I simply don't think the Hornets are ready, though I'm excited to watch star point guard Chris Paul in the postseason. Paul is just 22 and is considered by many a leading MVP candidate. The Hornets also have two of my favorites in reserve guard Bobby Jackson and perimeter shooter Peja Stojakovic.

The three-seed Spurs are the defending NBA champions, though they're losing to the Suns right now. The Spurs appeared to be putting it together with a late-season eight-game winning streak, but suffered big losses to Utah, Phoenix, and the Lakers down the stretch. However, they have a proven core of clutch players who are terrific together. In Tim Duncan and Tony Parker the team has two Finals MVP winners.

Fourth-seed Utah is terrific at home and should dispatch the fifth-seed Rockets with ease, but I don't expect much after the first round. Phoenix at No. 6 is loaded with talent and could surprise, but have they ever lived up to their regular-season billing? The seventh-seeded Mavs are dead in the water. I expect the No. 8 seed Nuggets to make things interesting against the Lakers with Carmelo Anthony and Allen Iverson. I'm tempted to say Lakers in six, but I worry that I'm underestimating Denver. If they play to their potential they could win the series, but the Nuggets are the ultimate roller coaster team.

Because of their clutch history and depth, I expect once again that the Spurs will win the Western Conference.

Way-early Finals Prediction

The Celtics put together a much more impressive regular season. So what? Well, the Spurs finishing third could be a sign of old age or rust. And it's true, many of the key Spurs are twelve months older than they were at the start of last year's playoffs.

But the Finals often come down to which team has the best go-to guy down the stretch. Most championship teams have a leader like Michael Jordan, Hakeem Olajuwon, Shaq or, yes, Tim Duncan. To me, no star on the Celtics has proven he can perform under those circumstances yet. Garnett hasn't, Pierce hasn't, and Ray Allen definitely hasn't. Can team play overcome individual brilliance? Sure, but the Spurs are a pretty sweet team, too. San Antonio in seven.

Comments

blaine said…
Based on yesterday's double OT thriller, I'd say your prediction of the Spurs as Champs is right on. I can't remember ever seeing a better playoff game than the one yesterday. If you could see past all the whining and arguing with the refs, it was actually a really good basketball game. I can't believe Timmy had the onions to take that three with the game on the line seeing how he had only taken 5 threes the whole year (and that was his first make). I guess that goes to show the confidence the Spurs have in themselves and (just like you were talking about Mike) the ability of their star players to make the big shots when it counts.

I think the Nugs could pull off the upset, but they will need to shut down Kobe. I don't think any of our guards can play him one on one, since they are 6 foot nothing and Kobe is 6'7" he will ba able to get any jump shot he wants. I think they should try playing a zone D like they did a few times towards the end of the year when they were making their playoff run. More than anything, it's going to take much more effort than they usually put forth on the defensive end if they hope to have a chance of winning the series.
Mike said…
Suns-Spurs looked awesome, though thanks to stake conference-related duties I had to leave my house at the end of regulation. I followed the rest of the game via the Internet on my cell phone, which, I have to say, is not as fun as watching it live. Sad I missed Timmy D's big shot, though I can't believe you're surprised he stepped up in the clutch.

Yeah, anyway, so the Nuggets got destroyed yesterday...positively annihilated...so maybe I was way off. I don't think I'd made Kobe taking jump shots—he still seems a little streaky from outside to me—but he could also post up or drive on our small guards at will. It'd be sweet if Carmelo was the kind of player to take on those challenges, they way Kobe started on AI, but it's not worth getting him in foul trouble. And man, were you right about the defense!
blaine said…
Well, I'm not surprised that he stepped up at a pivotal moment in the game, I'm just surprised that he took a three! That was only his 5th attempt all year and he hadn't made one up to that point. C'mon you know that took a lot of guts to take that shot.
Mike said…
I dunno, dude, a grown man with four rings is probably not afraid of shooting a three-pointer. And what else was he gonna do, dribble the clock out? I have heard throughout his career that Duncan has been developing three-point range, though you never see it in games, so it's definitely a cool thing to see.

Besides, since he's a post player I don't think anyone would have faulted him for missing it, so it's kind of all gravy taking a shot like that.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...