Skip to main content

It's the Lakers

On the night my intramural team advanced to the second round of the playoffs, the National Basketball Association's playoff picture has fallen into place. And our beloved Denver Nuggets will be facing the Los Angeles Lakers in the first round.

This is bad news in my opinion; I would have much preferred to face the younger, less dominant New Orleans Hornets. However, you don't really get to complain when you squeak into the playoffs as the No. 8 seed.

As opposed to a full-blown preview right now, I prefer to focus on what I've seen from the Lakers lately, which is somewhat scary. Their biggest achievement, of course, is that they captured the Western Conference's No. 1 seed. I'm tempted not to read too much into this; after all, their 57-25 record is only seven games better than the Nuggets'.

More impressively, they've outscored opponents by 7.3 points per game (best in the West, third overall), and have the No. 4 scoring offense in the NBA (the Nuggets are No. 2).

But the weirdest thing about this Lakers team is how well Kobe fits in on it. From what I've seen, which admittedly isn't the whole season or anything, the Lakers are now the team of Kobe's dreams: built around his offense. But it works. In a recent game against the Clippers, a game the Lakers dominated but one in which he didn't shoot well, his teammates seemed to defer to him in just the right amount. Also, he didn't force crazy shots the way he has in the past.

That may not sound like much, but I think Kobe's selfishness has been the biggest thing holding him back in his career. Now he can just let his talent shine. I may be reading too much into what I saw that night, but this Lakers team seems to work hard and play well together. Good for them, because I don't really fear guys like Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom.

I've been hard on Kobe in the past, and I still think he was unconscionably self-centered at times in the past. But he also played incredibly well on championship teams at a very young age. And he has many of the attributes of the league's all-time legends, like an insatiable work ethic and a constant drive to get better. (That's huge, by the way: in my mind, it's one of the things that separates the Elways of the world from the Marinos.) Now the question is, can the Nuggets' twin stars divert his attention and make him revert to one-on-one battle mode? We'll find out starting this weekend.

Comments

blaine said…
I agree with you Mike, the Nuggets probably would've been better off playing the Hornets in the first round, but after all the inconsistent play I'm just relieved they're even in the playoffs.

I do think they can beat the Lakers, and the team seems to be committed to trying to win a championship. I went to the game last night and just before tipoff Marcus Camby took one of the mics and addressed the whole crowd. He said on behalf of the team he just wanted to thank everyone for their support and let us all know that they are going to work hard to bring a championship to Denver. It was pretty cool, kind of had a high school pep rally feel to it.
Anonymous said…
Go Lakers!
Mike said…
Come on, what frigtard wrote that?
Anonymous said…
Who guards Kobe? Unless it is the vail sheriff the nuggets gets swept. Even with the sheriff the nuggets would win the first three and then drop the ball and loose the final 4. Lakers in 4. If Karl and Melo can stay sober than maybe 5 games. But i will be rooting for those up-standing citizen nuggets.
Mike said…
The game is just about to start...but let me say there is no way the Nuggets get swept. The Lakers are not that good, and besides, the Nuggets are really explosive, sort of like last year's 8 seed (the Warriors). Man, I am so pumped for this to get started!

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...