Skip to main content

Oden for Obama

Last night I saw an Associated Press article about a blog post Portland Trailblazers rookie center Greg Oden made about his decision to support Barack Obama's presidential campaign.

I don't blame him. It's not like he's going to come out now and support Hillary, who's only lost about half the Union in a row at this point.

Of course, I know the real reason this made the news: most athletes don't say anything politically. That's partly because they don't want to spark controversy and potentially lose endorsements but, I suspect, more because they don't want to deal with the headaches of all the publicity that would come along with speaking their minds.

Think about it. When Hollywood people come out in support of some political issue, most people yawn and think they're idiots. Well, the same goes for athletes, except you add on the idea that everyone thinks they cheated their way through their education. Occasionally you'll get a Steve Nash type who wants the world to appreciate how well-rounded he is. (Nash spoke out early against the Iraq War, which he believed was a war solely for oil.) But who really wants to go out and try to guard Shaquille O'Neal in front of thousands all night, then answer probing questions about his political philosophy right afterwards? (Oden, as he jokes in his blog, is currently free of any game responsibilities because of microfracture knee surgery.)

Sports reporters often look back on the good old days and point out that a) no athletes take a controversial stand anymore, and b) no athlete has a cool nickname anymore. I love it when a sportswriter complains about the dearth of good nicknames for modern athletes. Um, hey frigtard, don't you think maybe you're the one who should be doing something about that?

Anyway, I think it's kind of cool that Oden did this. I don't think a blog post represents some idiot abusing his fame, and besides, all Oden really does is in the end of his post is encourage young people to vote. It really makes me wonder if we'll see more of this as the election year goes on. What do you think about athletes speaking out on politicians or political issues?

Comments

John said…
I actually think there might be another reason athletes don't speak out more on political issues - like most Americans (including many successful, wealthy Americans), they may not have strong political views one way or the other. So it may not be realistic to expect more of them to comment on political affairs.

I am also not convinced that athletes of previous eras wouold be more political if they were around today. In the first place, we remember the athletes who were more politically active or had cooler nicknames and forget about the rest. Moreover, more athletes had a personal stake in politics back then, because many of them had overcome social and political barriers (i.e., racism and segregation) to make it to the top. Almost all politics is personal, and today's athletes don't face political obstacles to their athletic advancement in nearly the same way.

That said, I approve of any person espousing an intelligent view on politics, athlete or otherwise, and it sounds like Oden did just that. And he should be commended for trying to influence his fans to do something productive like vote.

And I agree that sportswriters are to blame for the lack of good nicknames. They have no creativity anymore.
blaine said…
Nowadays it seems that informed voters are becoming more and more of a rarity. It seems like so many people are afraid of being confrontational, or concerned with being P.C. that the subject of politics is rarely discussed. I think that is just the opposite of what needs to happen these days. We as Americans should be discussing politics more than any other issue with anyone and everyone, and especially with those who don't share our own political views. Talking politics with our friends, co-workers, and family is the best way for us to learn about different viewpoints without getting them from biased sources.

As public figures I think some athletes might be worried about ostracizing some of their fans by publicly supporting political figures. Some athletes, on the other hand, are too narcissistic to give a rat's a about what's going on in politics.

So, if Greg Oden is willing to publicly support Obama this will hopefully encourage those who read his blog to try to learn more about Obama and the other candidates. I agree with John that Oden should be commended for his willingness to stand up for what he believes in and most importantly, encourage others to do the same.
Mike said…
Blaine, you sound like a Get Out the Vote commercial. Just saying. For a variety of reasons, I do expect people to be thinking about/discussing this year's election more than any in a while; certainly more than most did in 2004. Now as to whether those discussions will include educated opinions...that I'm not so sure about.

John, you bring up great points, and I especially like the one about only the more politically-active athletes being remembered.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...