Skip to main content

Rockies drop Game One

Let me tell you a story. Once upon a time, a baseball team called the Boston Red Sox had the best pitcher in the world. He was a fellow by the name of Pedro Martinez. Pedro, you see, could be counted on to win almost any time he pitched, especially if it was a big game.

One memorable year, the Red Sox faced the Cleveland Indians in the first round. It was a hard-fought series that went the full five games. The teams were tied 8-8 in just the fourth inning of that final game. Were the Red Sox worried? No. They had Pedro. Sidelined by an injury in Game 1, Pedro returned to the mound to stop the bleeding. He went the rest of the game-six clutch innings-and didn't give up a single hit. Boston, of course, won.

Was he done? Far from it. In the next round, the Red Sox faced their hated rivals and eventual mirror image, the New York Yankees. Pedro was called on to pitch once again. And once again, he was masterful. He went seven innings, stuck out twelve, and gave up no runs in Boston's 13-1 victory. In other words, Pedro was completely dominant.

Tonight, following up a clutch performance against the Cleveland Indians, Josh Beckett dominated the Rockies in another 13-1 Boston victory. He went seven innings and struck out nine batters. If history tells us anything, it's that one dominant performance like that will always change a series. Boston will go on to win the World Series, right?

Oh, I almost forgot. Funny thing about that Pedro story. You see, he made the New York Yankees-a fantastic team-look like a bunch of Little Leaguers that night. Kind of like the way the Rockies looked tonight. So how did that 1999 ALCS end, anyway? Well, the Yankees won it in five games, then won the World Series.

I'm not saying the Rockies will win in five. But don't give up yet.

Comments

John said…
My thoughts exactly. Game 1 was far more important to Boston than it was to us - they were at home and had their ace on the mound. I fully expected to lose to Beckett. I wish we had done a little bit more, but it is far to early to call this one in.
blaine said…
OK it would appear that some "I told you sos" are in order after last night. Beckett is freaken amazing. I hate him.

However, I was more concerned with how poorly the Rockies pitched last night. They let the Sox score all but 2 of their runs with 2 outs. What's up with Speier walking in 3 straight batters.

If Jimenez can throw some strikes and trust the Rockies amazing defense I think we will be fine tonight. They definitely can't walk 8 batters and win.
Mike said…
Well, not to be a complete wise-a, but I think the game was equally important to both teams. I just think that, thanks to Beckett and playing at home, the Red Sox were a better team last night than they will be for the rest of the series.

Blaine, I'm in no mood for "I told you so"s. The walks were just murder, though. Really painful.
Mike said…
Actually, let me correct that. The worst part was seeing that freaking kid dancing in the stands during the sixth or seventh inning or whatever. Man, that hurts. That's the last thing I wanted to see, the typically-paranoid Boston fans toying with us.
John said…
I still think last night's game was more important to the Sox than it was to us - if we had won, we would have been in command of the series (by virtue of having beaten Beckett and taken away home field advantage), but their win does not put them in quite the same position.

I agree that our pitching needs to improve if we are to have a shot - it's like our guys were so afraid to give up hits that they chose to walk everyone (home) instead.

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...