Skip to main content

Bonds hits 756

So I just got a phone call from a friend of mine (who may or may not revel himself in the comments) who told me he just watched in person as Barry Bonds broke Hank Aaron's career home run record. And these are my immediate thoughts on that.

1. Congratulations to Bonds. Breaking Aaron's record is an amazing accomplishment. It's funny to me that if Bonds hadn't become unstoppable in this decade, he probably would have gone down in history a little underrated.

2. To everyone who says Bonds cheated to get this record: go ahead. Tell me what rule he broke.

The more I think about it, the more I come back to that. Isn't breaking a rule the definition of cheating? Even assuming Bonds took steroids before they were against the rules (something almost everyone does assume), he's never failed a drug test, as far as we know, since testing was implemented. (It's possible he failed in that first year when testing happened but there were no punishments or publicity for failing. And is it just me, or do you think Major League Baseball is going to test him tomorrow ?)

So I'm not sure he ever really "cheated". On the other hand, it's almost certain that the cutting edge of performance-enhancing drugs is ahead of testing. If you want to assume the worst, Bonds could certainly be taking something undetectable. But you could say that about any athlete, and I'm not familiar with any evidence that Bonds is taking anything right now.

Is taking steroids without a prescription illegal? Yes. I'm just not sure if that's relevant to whether Bonds cheated at baseball per se.

Now, is it morally wrong? I wouldn't take illegal drugs just to be stronger for a lot of reasons, and some of them have to do with my own values. So yeah, I certainly don't support Bonds' steroid use, if it's true. But I also don't condone calling a guy a cheater and trashing him at every turn if he didn't really cheat. Why not just say you don't like him because he's a jerk? Plenty of proof of that.

I'm not just playing the devil's advocate here; I really haven't decided what I think of Bonds completely. I just wish baseball had taken a firmer stance against steroids earlier, and I wish the players' union hadn't treated testing (and the health of its members) as nothing more than a bargaining chip.

3. Bonds' new record does nothing to diminish the fantastic career Aaron had. Aaron was a terrific player: a rookie of the year, an MVP, and a gamer and a legend in every sense of both words.

And I don't mean to disrespect Aaron in any way. But even though he's held the career home run mark my entire life, I never thought of him as necessarily the greatest home run hitter ever. Is Dan Marino the best quarterback of all time just because he threw for the most yards?

You're free to make up your own mind about Bonds, too. If you're really that torn up that his name's in some book (which might not even be a real book, for all I know), then you need to get out more.

Comments

John said…
I personally don't care one way or another whether Bonds' name appears in the record book, and I am far from being a baseball enthusiast, so perhaps my opinion isn't worth too much on this topic. But it seems characteristically baseball lame to have all of this controversy when (1) without steroids, the game never would have come back from the 1995 strike; (2) the league clearly acquiesced in steroid use by not prohibiting it and turning a blind eye to players bulking up; and (3) everyone wants to complain but no one has a clear solution to what to do about Bonds' record. And I agree that without proof Bonds broke a rule of the game, the league has little grounds to complain about his record. This isn't Pete Rose.

What I find perhaps most ironic is that no one talks about Ruth's records being illegitimate even though he played in a league that prohibited black players, many of whom were arguably the best in the world at the time. So Ruth had an unfair advantage over players from other eras that might have been even bigger than whatever advantage Bonds got from steroids - but no one suggests that should tarnish Ruth's legacy.

All in all, I am happy that Bonds broke the record at home, so we could all be spared the indignity of fans booing at him.
10:04 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...
11 comments
Read more

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...
12 comments
Read more

Payback

It's a nice little coincidence. Sunday the Broncos face the Steelers, who knocked them out of last year's playoffs. Tomorrow night the Nuggets play the L.A. Clippers, who knocked them out of last year's playoffs. Friday the Avalanche host the Anaheim Mighty Ducks, who knocked them out of last year's playoffs. (All right, the part about the Avs was a complete fabrication, but you believed me, didn't you?) Forget the Steelers game. The last thing I want to talk about right now is Denver's football team. (Seriously, what was that Sunday? I finally start to fall for the defense, and voila! Peyton Manning, for the first time ever, gets the better of it. You win some, you lose to the Colts.) I'm not so excited about the Clippers game either, per se, but I am glad the NBA is back, especially after this week. So what has changed from when we last left the squad? (Not that much.) New guys: The Smiths, Joe and J.R., might be Denver's most effective sibling duo...
4 comments
Read more