Skip to main content

College football thoughts

My thoughts on the college football season...

1. Colorado is not good. I meant to live-blog a game or something, but really, what other conclusion could I have come to? There’s plenty of blame to go around-the new coach hasn’t made a lick of difference, Bernard Jackson throws more passes to the ground than to his receivers (49.7% completion rate this year), and the defense has kept things just close enough to get us beat.

By the way, how much of a grace period does a new coach get? Do we give him four or five years to get all of his kind of players on the team? Or can we expect him to, you know, do his job the first few years, too? I don’t think Dan Hawkins should be fired or anything, but I guess I expected a lot more this year.

2. BYU is back...I guess. Somehow BYU has slipped back in to its rightful place at the bottom of the Top 25 polls. I’m not the biggest fan of Alma’s mater, though I do hate Utah at least as much as I despise Nebraska.

When I was a kid, the Captain and I used to look at the AP polls on Tuesday to see where BYU should be ranked. This usually involved counting out spots in the “Also receiving votes” section and determining that the Cougars were 28th or so in the nation. Good times. They brought back the old jerseys, and now they’ve brought back the old tradition of beating up on crappy teams all year long. See? New coaches don’t have to struggle.

3. Should Louisv-I mean Rutgers-play in the title game? Last Friday on PTI, Lee Corso announced that no matter what happens this year, Rutgers wouldn’t deserve a national title game berth over a team from a real conference. Big surprise. Corso, like Billy Packer on the basketball side, is one of those college analysts who can’t stop hyping the big schools.

I’m not sure that makes him wrong, though. Rutgers’ schedule is pretty easy, and they’ve had some close calls. They’ve only played one ranked team all year (Louisville last week). Big schools play way tougher schedules! Um, right?

Maybe. Michigan, for example, has only played one ranked team so far. They still have to play Ohio State, the current No. 1 in both polls. Does that really count, though? Some people already think a Michigan-Ohio State rematch should be the national title game, regardless of who wins. Rutgers isn’t allowed to lose any games.

Most top teams have played two or three ranked squads already. Thus Rutgers’ schedule has been easier than most, but no one in college football plays a good team every week.

And Rutgers is undefeated, something only Ohio and Boise States can say. Yeah, the schedule’s easy, but it’s the best they could possibly do. Look at it this way: if you put Peyton Manning, LaDainian Tomlinson, and Brian Urlacher in Rutgers uniforms this year, they’d obviously be the best team in college football, but they’d still only be 9-0. (They’d be 9-0 since Rutgers hasn’t played Florida…right, Peyton?) My point is that we don’t know how good Rutgers can be, because they’ve passed every test so far.

My answer’s kind of a cop-out-I want to see what happens in the last few games before I say if Rutgers deserves a spot. I do think it’s too early to say they don’t deserve a spot, though.

Comments

David said…
i think you hawk gets a get out of jail free pass for this year. one catastrophic season. next year, we need to be batting close to .500.

then a winning record and bowl birth for the third year. i think that is a relatively standard, and fair expectation, no?
Anonymous said…
I think unreasonable expectations is the only way to go-Hawkin should be gone by tomorrow and Rutgers has to be like a hundred times better. A perfect season is not nearly good enough unless you have a history of winning the national championship (this excludes BYU, and any of the Academies)
Mike said…
I guess that's fair enough, but didn't we have a winning record and a bowl game last year?

David II, I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic.
Mike said…
I was going to make the same playoffs crack-of course that's the only real solution.
Anonymous said…
Remember though...Rutgers will have also played 2 ranked teams by the end of the year (West Virginia).

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...