Skip to main content

College football thoughts

My thoughts on the college football season...

1. Colorado is not good. I meant to live-blog a game or something, but really, what other conclusion could I have come to? There’s plenty of blame to go around-the new coach hasn’t made a lick of difference, Bernard Jackson throws more passes to the ground than to his receivers (49.7% completion rate this year), and the defense has kept things just close enough to get us beat.

By the way, how much of a grace period does a new coach get? Do we give him four or five years to get all of his kind of players on the team? Or can we expect him to, you know, do his job the first few years, too? I don’t think Dan Hawkins should be fired or anything, but I guess I expected a lot more this year.

2. BYU is back...I guess. Somehow BYU has slipped back in to its rightful place at the bottom of the Top 25 polls. I’m not the biggest fan of Alma’s mater, though I do hate Utah at least as much as I despise Nebraska.

When I was a kid, the Captain and I used to look at the AP polls on Tuesday to see where BYU should be ranked. This usually involved counting out spots in the “Also receiving votes” section and determining that the Cougars were 28th or so in the nation. Good times. They brought back the old jerseys, and now they’ve brought back the old tradition of beating up on crappy teams all year long. See? New coaches don’t have to struggle.

3. Should Louisv-I mean Rutgers-play in the title game? Last Friday on PTI, Lee Corso announced that no matter what happens this year, Rutgers wouldn’t deserve a national title game berth over a team from a real conference. Big surprise. Corso, like Billy Packer on the basketball side, is one of those college analysts who can’t stop hyping the big schools.

I’m not sure that makes him wrong, though. Rutgers’ schedule is pretty easy, and they’ve had some close calls. They’ve only played one ranked team all year (Louisville last week). Big schools play way tougher schedules! Um, right?

Maybe. Michigan, for example, has only played one ranked team so far. They still have to play Ohio State, the current No. 1 in both polls. Does that really count, though? Some people already think a Michigan-Ohio State rematch should be the national title game, regardless of who wins. Rutgers isn’t allowed to lose any games.

Most top teams have played two or three ranked squads already. Thus Rutgers’ schedule has been easier than most, but no one in college football plays a good team every week.

And Rutgers is undefeated, something only Ohio and Boise States can say. Yeah, the schedule’s easy, but it’s the best they could possibly do. Look at it this way: if you put Peyton Manning, LaDainian Tomlinson, and Brian Urlacher in Rutgers uniforms this year, they’d obviously be the best team in college football, but they’d still only be 9-0. (They’d be 9-0 since Rutgers hasn’t played Florida…right, Peyton?) My point is that we don’t know how good Rutgers can be, because they’ve passed every test so far.

My answer’s kind of a cop-out-I want to see what happens in the last few games before I say if Rutgers deserves a spot. I do think it’s too early to say they don’t deserve a spot, though.

Comments

David said…
i think you hawk gets a get out of jail free pass for this year. one catastrophic season. next year, we need to be batting close to .500.

then a winning record and bowl birth for the third year. i think that is a relatively standard, and fair expectation, no?
Anonymous said…
I think unreasonable expectations is the only way to go-Hawkin should be gone by tomorrow and Rutgers has to be like a hundred times better. A perfect season is not nearly good enough unless you have a history of winning the national championship (this excludes BYU, and any of the Academies)
Mike said…
I guess that's fair enough, but didn't we have a winning record and a bowl game last year?

David II, I can't tell if you're being serious or sarcastic.
Mike said…
I was going to make the same playoffs crack-of course that's the only real solution.
Anonymous said…
Remember though...Rutgers will have also played 2 ranked teams by the end of the year (West Virginia).

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...