Skip to main content

53 Bronx

The news is a couple days old, but I still need to talk about the Broncos finalizing their 53-man roster.

The good:

So long, college rival. The best name you don’t see on the list is Bradlee van Pelt. Hallelujah. I could have told Mike Shanahan years ago to save his time, but I’m just glad it’s over now. Can you imagine if van Pelt had had to fill in during a playoff run and we had to root for and rely on him? Thank goodness it never came to that. Now we just need to cut Cecil Sapp, even though he never plays. (Hey, this is the one week a year I acknowledge CSU, though I’m not about to talk about Montana State.)

Promising young players. The Broncos were 13-3 and went to the AFC title game last year, but I like that rookie class more and more as we close in on the season. Jay Cutler has everyone in town excited, Mike Bell may start, and while I don’t think I’ve seen him play, I have faith in Elvis Dumervil. Second-year man Cedric Cobbs only played late in games, but piled up yards and ran with passion. Yes, he did it against fourth-stringers, but a lot of Denver’s successful backs get their start that way.

The back seven. Champ, Darrent Williams, Domonique Foxworth, and Karl Paymah at least grant the Broncos the appearance of quality depth at corner. The safeties look solid, though I’m curious if any of the young guys will work their way into the lineup. Linebacker remains a position of strength.

The bad:

Plummer’s backup? I am glad Jay Cutler has looked good in the preseason. I’d love him to make the Hall of Fame. That said, I am a little concerned that we’re one (femur) snap away from starting a rookie. Then again, it’s been a few years since I’ve really liked our backups, so Cutler still represents an improvement at No. 2. And besides, everyone wants to see him play sometime this year. (Speaking of which, why do NFL fans love young quarterbacks so much? No one wants Al Wilson to go down so we can see what his backup can do, you know?)

D-line. Storylines were the saving grace of last year’s defensive line. Each time one of the Cleveland imports made a tackle, announcers and columnists alike praised the front office’s genius. But if the four players couldn’t have been related in some way, none of them would have looked special-basically, four guys got credit for doing the work of one or two good players. And Trevor Pryce is gone.

New ex-Brown Kenard Lang played well in the preseason, but I still wonder where the pass rush will come from. Our speedy and deep linebacker corps assures effective blitzing, but you can’t send the house every time.

Pass catching. Darius Watts didn’t make the team. You’ve heard of Rod Smith and Javon Walker. But do you know who’s No. 3 out of Todd Devoe, Charlie Adams, David Kircus, and Brandon Marshall?

Ed McCaffrey and Smith turned out very well, but the Broncos haven’t really developed a solid contributor at the position since. (Maybe that’s unfair-Ashley Lelie had his moments, despite a work ethic that can only be described as Congressional.) In any event, I’m not particularly confident in any of the third options. And it doesn’t help that none of the tight ends are established receiving threats.

What do you think? Do I need to change that division title prediction?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...