Skip to main content

53 Bronx

The news is a couple days old, but I still need to talk about the Broncos finalizing their 53-man roster.

The good:

So long, college rival. The best name you don’t see on the list is Bradlee van Pelt. Hallelujah. I could have told Mike Shanahan years ago to save his time, but I’m just glad it’s over now. Can you imagine if van Pelt had had to fill in during a playoff run and we had to root for and rely on him? Thank goodness it never came to that. Now we just need to cut Cecil Sapp, even though he never plays. (Hey, this is the one week a year I acknowledge CSU, though I’m not about to talk about Montana State.)

Promising young players. The Broncos were 13-3 and went to the AFC title game last year, but I like that rookie class more and more as we close in on the season. Jay Cutler has everyone in town excited, Mike Bell may start, and while I don’t think I’ve seen him play, I have faith in Elvis Dumervil. Second-year man Cedric Cobbs only played late in games, but piled up yards and ran with passion. Yes, he did it against fourth-stringers, but a lot of Denver’s successful backs get their start that way.

The back seven. Champ, Darrent Williams, Domonique Foxworth, and Karl Paymah at least grant the Broncos the appearance of quality depth at corner. The safeties look solid, though I’m curious if any of the young guys will work their way into the lineup. Linebacker remains a position of strength.

The bad:

Plummer’s backup? I am glad Jay Cutler has looked good in the preseason. I’d love him to make the Hall of Fame. That said, I am a little concerned that we’re one (femur) snap away from starting a rookie. Then again, it’s been a few years since I’ve really liked our backups, so Cutler still represents an improvement at No. 2. And besides, everyone wants to see him play sometime this year. (Speaking of which, why do NFL fans love young quarterbacks so much? No one wants Al Wilson to go down so we can see what his backup can do, you know?)

D-line. Storylines were the saving grace of last year’s defensive line. Each time one of the Cleveland imports made a tackle, announcers and columnists alike praised the front office’s genius. But if the four players couldn’t have been related in some way, none of them would have looked special-basically, four guys got credit for doing the work of one or two good players. And Trevor Pryce is gone.

New ex-Brown Kenard Lang played well in the preseason, but I still wonder where the pass rush will come from. Our speedy and deep linebacker corps assures effective blitzing, but you can’t send the house every time.

Pass catching. Darius Watts didn’t make the team. You’ve heard of Rod Smith and Javon Walker. But do you know who’s No. 3 out of Todd Devoe, Charlie Adams, David Kircus, and Brandon Marshall?

Ed McCaffrey and Smith turned out very well, but the Broncos haven’t really developed a solid contributor at the position since. (Maybe that’s unfair-Ashley Lelie had his moments, despite a work ethic that can only be described as Congressional.) In any event, I’m not particularly confident in any of the third options. And it doesn’t help that none of the tight ends are established receiving threats.

What do you think? Do I need to change that division title prediction?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...