Skip to main content

Davies out; Cougars next?

As you’ve probably heard by now, the BYU men’s basketball team has suspended its leading rebounder, Brandon Davies, for the rest of the season for an honor code violation.

The move comes as somewhat of a surprise in college basketball circles, as the Cougars are ranked No. 3 in both polls, and No. 1 in RPI. This is the best BYU team in years, and one that can hardly afford to lose such a key performer. Before tonight’s loss to New Mexico, the Cougars were regarded as a likely No. 1 seed in the NCAA Tournament, which starts in two weeks.

After watching Saturday’s win over San Diego State, I’ve taken the Cougars seriously as contenders for the national championship. Jimmer’s great, and they play with a poise rare amongst Cougar teams I’ve followed.

However, the reactions of BYU fans are puzzling to me. I’ve seen more than one student there say how proud they are of the school. When said students aren’t basketball fans (and they haven’t been, so far), such expressions of pride underwhelm me. If you have no interest in BYU basketball, then of course you’re okay with the program getting its legs cut out from under it. It takes no courage to support the sacrifice of something you don’t care about, so why thump your chest on Facebook?

I do like the BYU basketball team, certainly more than I like the Honor Code Office, and I’ve gone back and forth today on this. The timing is just awful. But while I’m not surprised by the school’s decision, I’m not especially buoyed by it. BYU did exactly what you’d expect it to if you paid any attention to the school. Being a BYU fan and finding satisfaction in the school not putting winning first would be like a USC fan expressing shock that his football team did put winning first. It’s just what they do.

That’s not to say other schools’ values are just as valid as BYU’s. I’d rather have the integrity the Cougars showed than the anything-goes philosophy of many other athletic departments. But anyone could value other things above winning, and then not win.

The fact is, the Cougars are playing a different game from everyone else. It really wouldn’t make sense for a state university to set the same standards of personal conduct that a university owned by the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints would. It’s fair for BYU students to be proud of BYU for being BYU, but as a sports fan that doesn’t do much for me.

Of course, if the Cougars do win it all, or even make the Final Four, that would be truly impressive, and it would make sense to hold up the school as a model for all athletic departments. It’s just hard to see that happening after an 18-point loss.

My only other thought is how bad I feel for everyone involved in the team. Tough draw for the coach. Downer for Jimmer Fredette, a truly great collegiate star whose athletic peak might be this season. I hate to think this will cost him his moment of glory in the NCAA Tournament. And I feel sad for Davies, who may well have cost his teammates the high point of their basketball careers, but who is already paying dearly in public humiliation for his private failings. At any other school, his only job would be to beat his opponents; but at BYU, playing well and living right are both just part of the game.

Comments

John said…
I agree - BYU did exactly what it had to do. A failure to discipline Davies would have been far more noteworthy than full enforcement of the Honor Code.

I have been pleasantly surprised by the reaction of some sports pundits, whom I expected would reflexively criticize BYU's high standards. But many of them have noted how refreshing it is for a school to have standards and actually enforce them. BYU has proven to be the polar opposite of many schools (i.e., the aforementioned USC) and the pious fat cats who control the NCAA's exploitative cash machine.

I have no love lost for BYU sports, but I was hoping to see them make a run this year. Jimmer is great, and I hate to see his talent squandered in what might have been his greatest hour. I unfortunately don't see him being much of an impact player on the next level.
blaine said…
I almost always root AGAINST BYU, but I applaud the University for recognizing that moral standards take priority over sports. That being said, how is it that Jim McMahon was never kicked off the team?
Mike said…
Well, Blaine, there's an hilarious answer to that question:

http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/05/jim-mcmahon-talks-about-b-y-u-s-honor-code/
Mike said…
My peeve at this point is people saying how proud they are of BYU, like they did something risky. But, predictably, almost all BYU fans praise the school's decision, so it took no courage to make it. It's not hard to do popular things!
blaine said…
So, BYU administrators turn a blind eye to football players but not basketball players? Is the honor code more strictly enforced now vs. when McMahon was a student?
Mike said…
It's more strictly enforced towards athletes now—BYU's all-time leading rusher left last year after an Honor Code violation of his own.

Popular posts from this blog

National Basketball Association Finals Preview Blowout!

If you're looking for a stereotypical matchup breakdown for the NBA Finals between the Detroit Pistons and San Antonio Spurs, (Game One is tonight, 7 o'clock Mountain, ABC), you've come to the right place! Center: Ben Wallace, Pistons vs. Nazr Mohammed, Spurs Wallace might be the league's top defender, winning his third Defensive Player of the Year award this season and leading the Pistons in both blocks and steals. It's said he's an improved offensive player, but he still scores primarily on tips and wide-open dunks. "Big Ben" is horrific from the foul line, connecting on 42.8% this season. Also, his brother has taken on NBA players and can probably beat up Mohammed's brother. Mohammed has been a good fit for the Spurs since being traded from the Knicks. It appears Isiah Thomas may have finally made his first mistake as general manager in New York, as Mohammed has started every Spurs' playoff game, averaging 8.1 points to go with a solid seven...

Forget Brett Favre (*)

From my 2007 NFL season preview : Favre's not as good as he once was-who is?-but he's not the disgrace people make him out to be...I don't think he "deserves" to go out with another Lombardi or anything, but I hope he gets to leave on a good note. Oops. What a mistake. And I even knew this day was coming. Let me say that Brett Favre deserves to go down in history with whatever records he earns, so long as a giant asterisk is placed by each and every one of them. As you may have heard, Sunday's victory over the New York Giants made Favre the winningest quarterback in NFL history. I don't know what ESPN did on TV, but this record practically went unnoticed in the places I follow sports. But it's of crucial importance to me. Why? "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer [and indisputable greatest quarterback of all time] John Elway. Humble...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...