Skip to main content

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right.

Why we were doomed

Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be.

The mathematical angle

Legend has it that Cowboys running back Duane Thomas, after a great game in Super Bowl VI, was asked how it felt to play in the ultimate game. He responded with something along the lines of, “if it’s the ultimate game, why are they playing it again next year?”

In other words, ten years from now, ten more teams will have won the Super Bowl. In the last fifteen years, fifteen teams won the Pac-12, or would have, had it remained viable as an ongoing concern, but the point is that fifteen conference titles would be up for grabs.

I look at it this way: you’d expect an average program to win a 12-team conference once every 12 years. You’d expect an above-average team to win it more often, and a below-average team to win it less often. Saying “this program won’t win it in the next 15 years” is basically another way of saying “this program is going to be a little below average in that conference”. At the time we moved, we were obviously below average, sifting through the wreckage of having hired the one coach who apparently didn’t have much to do with Boise State’s success.

One pet peeve that has cropped up for me over the years is the concept of a long-suffering team. Don’t get me wrong: teams like the Boston Red Sox and the Chicago Cubs really did have long championship droughts in my lifetime, and probably had millions of fans who never saw their teams win it all. It was cool those teams had a chance to win. But people say this all the time now. In 2019, the Toronto Raptors won the NBA title for the first time in franchise history. I remember hearing sportscasters say they’d waited 24 years. Well, twenty-four years isn’t very long! An expansion team is below average by design, at least their first few years, and there are 30 teams in the NBA. So the Raptors were, by that metric, an above-average franchise. That’s not suffering! As a Nuggets fan, I really hated hearing it since we’d been to all of one Finals (the 1976 ABA Finals) in franchise history, and I had to hear about how bad these Toronto fans have had it? (Of course, since then, Nikola Jokic has emerged as one of the greatest players of all time and we won the 2023 title, so I wouldn’t call Nuggets fans long-suffering now, either.)

So anyway, the Buffs only had to be a little below average to miss winning a single conference title, and given we were about to lose at least seven games for the fifth year in a row in 2010, that didn’t seem like a tall order.

Close calls

I had little reason to worry. CU has posted only three winning records since then: my final year as a student, in 2016, when the Washington Huskies blew us out in the conference championship, but we were very good otherwise behind Sefo Liufau and Phillip Lindsay; 2020, when we went 4–2; and last season, when we had both the conference’s offensive and defensive players of the year in Shedeur Sanders and Travis Hunter (even if we were in the Big 12 by then).

How did we even remember this?

I set up a Google Calendar event for next month back in 2010. Wasn’t certain I’d still be using it, but I am. But honestly, it was pretty easy to remember given we were both going to be thinking about CU football every fall.

You don’t exactly post here often, do you?

Well, my favorite team is the Broncos and the comments on the last post were me making fun of Peyton Manning, so you tell me.

(Am I back? Probably not.)

Comments

blaine said…
Great to have you back, even if it's only for one victorious bet gloat!! CU's fall from college football relevance has been long and painful. I probably can't call myself a "long-suffering" fan given the fact that I usually stop following 3-4 games into each season when it becomes obvious they have no shot at being championship contender. That said, I still would love to see the Buffs return to double digit win status in the near future. The Sander's era has brought a ton of national attention and therefore money to the school and to Boulder. That's great and has been a lot of fun. I just assumed that with all the new attention would come more talented players and more success. Apparently not. Is this a recruiting problem? A play-calling problem? Is CU simply unable to be competitive in the new NCAA? We NEED another post discussing these topics!! We DEMAND it! Pleeeeeaaasseeeee!!!
Mike said…
Thanks, Blaine! You know, it’s funny, in writing this post, I learned some CU history that I either never knew or had forgotten. The big one being that heading into the Orange Bowl where CU won their national championship, Coach Mac had an 0-4 record in bowl games. They’d been No. 1 heading into their bowl game the year before, so they did have a window where they were great, but in retrospect it wasn’t very long. As an undergrad during the Gary Barnett days, we also had that BCS appearance in 2001, which was awesome, followed by what felt like a string of “win the Big 12 North, get clobbered by Texas or Oklahoma in the conference championship” years. We could compete with big schools at our very best, but we weren’t really at our very best all that often over the years.

The tragedy of the Dan Hawkins era for me was that we had so many lost years that we got to the point where no 18-year-old was going to think of Colorado as a viable football destination. I thought the program was done forever. Coach Prime changed that, which I’m grateful for.

The first two years, I thought Prime was a great recruiter. In retrospect, Shedeur and Travis did a lot of the heavy lifting in making the program relevant, and we didn’t get better enough on the line in time to really capitalize on their presence. I don’t know if we’re going to slide back into irrelevance or not…

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...