Skip to main content

Thoughts on the Olympics' first week

I woke up early this morning to watch the U.S. beat Spain live in basketball, one of the few live events I've seen this year. (Which reminds me, I screwed up again on the 200 IM, accidentally checking Phelps' Wikipedia page for his career medals breakdown before the race was shown live in Mountain time. Thanks again, NBC!)

Anyway, the Americans—or Redeem Team, as they are so cutely called this year—dominated the Spaniards with superior athletic ability. Fittingly, Coach K had us looking like a Duke team, except like one from the late-90's, when they were good: they combined pressure defense and exquisite ball movement. Carmelo continued his torrid shooting with four threes, and Dwyane Wade especially continued his great play. LeBron James was good today but overall my opinion of him is almost down...he's still a little too prone to the what-the-heck-are-you-doing-type plays where he pulls up for a three when it's far from the best shot. However, he pulls some of them off, too, and has had some sick blocks already in the tourney. It has been a blast watching the U.S. team and I feel much better about our gold medal chances.

I watched the team competition in women's gymnastics, but not the individual all-around. After watching Nastia Liukin in the team competition I wasn't remotely surpised by her gold medal win; she was awesome under pressure. Even though I couldn't care much less for her sport it's always cool watching people come through like that. I felt bad for the telegenic Alicia Sacramone, who hurt the U.S. team when she fell off the balance beam, but as a fan was kind of annoyed by how rattled she was by it. I almost knew she'd make a big mistake on the next event, the floor exercise, where she fell again. For once, though, I was grateful for the tape delay, because I checked online to make sure we were just getting silver, then immediately went to bed. I also realized that by the next Olympics I will be way too old to call even the older gymnasts attractive ever again.

Does anyone remember the quote-unquote scandal of the American track-and-field guys showboating in Athens? Shawn Crawford and Justin Gatlin were winning the 100m semifinals, and one of them (I think Crawford) turned to the other one and started waving at him to go by. NBC announcer and former Denver Nuggets forward Tom Hammond laid into them for what I guess he thought was bad sportsmanship, but which I thought was just two guys fired up in the moment. Anyway, so tonight in the 100m final Usain Bolt slowed near the end to celebrate early, too, spreading his arms out and thumping his chest. I didn't hear a single negative word about it, nor did I want to. Combined with the public perception of the last few Dream Teams, it made me wonder, do Americans hold each other to a higher standard, and if they do, isn't that kind of stupid?

I can't decide whether I liked or hated the swimming announcers. On one hand, I liked the insight and how they were willing to make predictions, or tell me that some team leading a relay didn't really have a chance because the rest of their team was weak or whatever. And they were always right on that stuff. However, they had this weird way of trying to manage my expectations that felt annoying. Outside of Phelps, I liked watching the whole U.S. men's team and the women, too, at least when Katie Hoff wasn't cranking her goggles tight an inch deep into her skull. I especially liked watching Dara Torres, who first competed in the L.A. Olympics (!) and almost won gold in the 50m free tonight. It's cool to see a veteran getting it done like that.

Microsoft Silverlight, the plug-in for watching video on NBC's Olympic website, slowed my work and home desktops to a crawl and delivered intermittent choppiness on both streaming events and replays. The framerate smoothed out on my MacBook under both Vista and OS X, so there is hope if buying a new computer just for the Olympics makes sense to you. Still, I got the sense that the video experience was precisely engineered to be watchable, but also just bad enough that TV would always be preferable. I am pretty glad to be able to catch some stuff live, though. I hope in 2010 things look better and we can watch everything live.

NBC, on the whole, has been awful so far. The tape delay is absolutely killing me, and I saw the results to the men's 100m track final today about fifteen times on the Internet before it was televised. As always I love the replay of that race from the camera that glides alongside them...that always looks so epic. But for nights when I could be watching Michael Phelps live, but instead am stuck hearing about the mating habits of panda bears, I give out only one grade: F-.

Comments

blaine said…
It's a relief to see the USA Men's basketball team actually playing some defense. I think that reason alone will allow them to win the gold this year. I don't think they have had to even run a single offensive set play because it seems like they steal the ball every time the oppenent has the ball and go down for a break-away dunk. (I'm a little surprised the announcers haven't called out the American players for show-boating on some of their dunks.) Melo looked good on offense yesterday, but I thought his defense (as usual) looked suspect. He looks like he just gets really frustrated when his opponent beats him and then he committs a stupid foul.

I think it's crazy that, as you stated, Bolt slowed down to celebrate and STILL set a world record! That guy is ridiculous.

I agree on NBC's coverage. By the way, who is that woman they bring in for their Olympic Special that has a deeper voice than I do. I can't stand to listen to her. As soon as she comes on I have to change the channel until she's finished.
Mike said…
I was a little surprised by our willingness to run up the score...Tayshaun Prince hit a three in the closing minute and I'm like, is that entirely necessary? A real flashback to Church ball, where the winning time has to attempt a completely superfluous three at the end of every game. For some watching Prince reminded me to foul the crap out of anyone who does that this year.

Bolt was amazing! That one announcer kept saying he may have thrown away a 9.59...I really wish he would have kept it up and really lowered that record.

And are you talking about Mary Carillo?

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...