Skip to main content

It's the Lakers

On the night my intramural team advanced to the second round of the playoffs, the National Basketball Association's playoff picture has fallen into place. And our beloved Denver Nuggets will be facing the Los Angeles Lakers in the first round.

This is bad news in my opinion; I would have much preferred to face the younger, less dominant New Orleans Hornets. However, you don't really get to complain when you squeak into the playoffs as the No. 8 seed.

As opposed to a full-blown preview right now, I prefer to focus on what I've seen from the Lakers lately, which is somewhat scary. Their biggest achievement, of course, is that they captured the Western Conference's No. 1 seed. I'm tempted not to read too much into this; after all, their 57-25 record is only seven games better than the Nuggets'.

More impressively, they've outscored opponents by 7.3 points per game (best in the West, third overall), and have the No. 4 scoring offense in the NBA (the Nuggets are No. 2).

But the weirdest thing about this Lakers team is how well Kobe fits in on it. From what I've seen, which admittedly isn't the whole season or anything, the Lakers are now the team of Kobe's dreams: built around his offense. But it works. In a recent game against the Clippers, a game the Lakers dominated but one in which he didn't shoot well, his teammates seemed to defer to him in just the right amount. Also, he didn't force crazy shots the way he has in the past.

That may not sound like much, but I think Kobe's selfishness has been the biggest thing holding him back in his career. Now he can just let his talent shine. I may be reading too much into what I saw that night, but this Lakers team seems to work hard and play well together. Good for them, because I don't really fear guys like Pau Gasol and Lamar Odom.

I've been hard on Kobe in the past, and I still think he was unconscionably self-centered at times in the past. But he also played incredibly well on championship teams at a very young age. And he has many of the attributes of the league's all-time legends, like an insatiable work ethic and a constant drive to get better. (That's huge, by the way: in my mind, it's one of the things that separates the Elways of the world from the Marinos.) Now the question is, can the Nuggets' twin stars divert his attention and make him revert to one-on-one battle mode? We'll find out starting this weekend.

Comments

blaine said…
I agree with you Mike, the Nuggets probably would've been better off playing the Hornets in the first round, but after all the inconsistent play I'm just relieved they're even in the playoffs.

I do think they can beat the Lakers, and the team seems to be committed to trying to win a championship. I went to the game last night and just before tipoff Marcus Camby took one of the mics and addressed the whole crowd. He said on behalf of the team he just wanted to thank everyone for their support and let us all know that they are going to work hard to bring a championship to Denver. It was pretty cool, kind of had a high school pep rally feel to it.
Anonymous said…
Go Lakers!
Mike said…
Come on, what frigtard wrote that?
Anonymous said…
Who guards Kobe? Unless it is the vail sheriff the nuggets gets swept. Even with the sheriff the nuggets would win the first three and then drop the ball and loose the final 4. Lakers in 4. If Karl and Melo can stay sober than maybe 5 games. But i will be rooting for those up-standing citizen nuggets.
Mike said…
The game is just about to start...but let me say there is no way the Nuggets get swept. The Lakers are not that good, and besides, the Nuggets are really explosive, sort of like last year's 8 seed (the Warriors). Man, I am so pumped for this to get started!

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...