Skip to main content

Rockies drop Game One

Let me tell you a story. Once upon a time, a baseball team called the Boston Red Sox had the best pitcher in the world. He was a fellow by the name of Pedro Martinez. Pedro, you see, could be counted on to win almost any time he pitched, especially if it was a big game.

One memorable year, the Red Sox faced the Cleveland Indians in the first round. It was a hard-fought series that went the full five games. The teams were tied 8-8 in just the fourth inning of that final game. Were the Red Sox worried? No. They had Pedro. Sidelined by an injury in Game 1, Pedro returned to the mound to stop the bleeding. He went the rest of the game-six clutch innings-and didn't give up a single hit. Boston, of course, won.

Was he done? Far from it. In the next round, the Red Sox faced their hated rivals and eventual mirror image, the New York Yankees. Pedro was called on to pitch once again. And once again, he was masterful. He went seven innings, stuck out twelve, and gave up no runs in Boston's 13-1 victory. In other words, Pedro was completely dominant.

Tonight, following up a clutch performance against the Cleveland Indians, Josh Beckett dominated the Rockies in another 13-1 Boston victory. He went seven innings and struck out nine batters. If history tells us anything, it's that one dominant performance like that will always change a series. Boston will go on to win the World Series, right?

Oh, I almost forgot. Funny thing about that Pedro story. You see, he made the New York Yankees-a fantastic team-look like a bunch of Little Leaguers that night. Kind of like the way the Rockies looked tonight. So how did that 1999 ALCS end, anyway? Well, the Yankees won it in five games, then won the World Series.

I'm not saying the Rockies will win in five. But don't give up yet.

Comments

John said…
My thoughts exactly. Game 1 was far more important to Boston than it was to us - they were at home and had their ace on the mound. I fully expected to lose to Beckett. I wish we had done a little bit more, but it is far to early to call this one in.
blaine said…
OK it would appear that some "I told you sos" are in order after last night. Beckett is freaken amazing. I hate him.

However, I was more concerned with how poorly the Rockies pitched last night. They let the Sox score all but 2 of their runs with 2 outs. What's up with Speier walking in 3 straight batters.

If Jimenez can throw some strikes and trust the Rockies amazing defense I think we will be fine tonight. They definitely can't walk 8 batters and win.
Mike said…
Well, not to be a complete wise-a, but I think the game was equally important to both teams. I just think that, thanks to Beckett and playing at home, the Red Sox were a better team last night than they will be for the rest of the series.

Blaine, I'm in no mood for "I told you so"s. The walks were just murder, though. Really painful.
Mike said…
Actually, let me correct that. The worst part was seeing that freaking kid dancing in the stands during the sixth or seventh inning or whatever. Man, that hurts. That's the last thing I wanted to see, the typically-paranoid Boston fans toying with us.
John said…
I still think last night's game was more important to the Sox than it was to us - if we had won, we would have been in command of the series (by virtue of having beaten Beckett and taken away home field advantage), but their win does not put them in quite the same position.

I agree that our pitching needs to improve if we are to have a shot - it's like our guys were so afraid to give up hits that they chose to walk everyone (home) instead.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...