Skip to main content

Whipping

Well, that game pretty much sucked. What can I say? I thought Ohio State was better than that.

(An aside, before we get started here: I don't play fantasy sports, but I had a sort of fantasy-like dilemma tonight. Basically, I had Ohio State winning it all, and I was pulling for Ohio State, but if Florida won, I was actually going to win or tie for the win in both of my bracket groups. So who do I pull for? It was easy: I still went for Ohio State. And I don't even really like the Buckeyes for any reason. So I will never get people who like it when some NFL star torches their favorite team. Just absurd. (Plus it turned out my math was off and I might have lost anyway.))

Anyway, since the game was so lame, I just thought I'd share a few thoughts on some of the most famous players. And they are:

Joakim Noah: Could Noah have been any less impressive on the college game's biggest stage? He was plagued by foul trouble throughout, and he wasn't even aggressive when he was on the floor. Turned out Florida didn't need him, but it was surprising for a guy who plays so much on emotion.

Al Horford: I'd heard rumors this year that Horford was superior to his frontcourt running mate, and saw nothing tonight that would make me challenge that opinion. To be fair, I don't watch Florida much, but he was sweet. 18 points and 12 rebounds are plenty. Of course, Florida has so many widebodies up front that I probably confused half of his nicest plays with those of backup Chris Richard, who stepped up when Noah was out.

Mike Conley, Jr.: Conley finished with 20 points, six assists, and four steals, so it was a fine statistical night. But because he and his teammates got off to such a slow start, he had less of an impact than you'd think from just reading a box score. I don't know if you heard, but Billy Packer mentioned once or seven times that Conley plays low and can really challenge an opponent's dribble. He also braces himself a good minute before someone sets a pick on him. Thus, Florida neutralized his defense with screens whenever they needed to in the halfcourt.

Greg Oden: His performance wasn't quite as legendary as Jim Nantz and Packer were making it sound, but he played his guts out. 25 points, 12 rebounds, four blocks. Most of the time I've seen Oden this year, he's sort of blended in with his team, making some nice plays and disappearing for stretches. That was not the case tonight-he stood out the whole evening. While his defense was fantastic, I was most impressed with his offensive repertoire. He was not only bigger than Florida's inside players, he was quicker around the basket. I can't wait to see him in the pros, where he'll have some shooters that can spread the floor behind a deeper three-point line. I just hope he's not the next Patrick Ewing, which I guess is a pretty harsh standard to hold a freshman to.

Comments

David said…
oden needs to bulk up a lot to become a scorer... in my opinion.

else i see him becoming like a camby. adroit defenseman & rebounder, nominal scoring ability.

i don't think any of the florida guys are going to do anything in the pros. they are a good team, a very good team, but i don't think any of them are stars per se.
John said…
I guess we'll soon be able to test your hypothesis re: the Florida players. I don't know if any of them are stars, but I think three of the four (minus Green) can become decent role players, especially Horford. But, that said, I wouldn't mind if the Nuggets grabbed Green, who may even fall to the second round.
David said…
how 'bout some masters coverage up in here?

j/k
Mike said…
Well, I would say Oden seems bigger already than Camby, and of course he's 18, so he should fill out no problem.

I sort of agree with both of you on Florida's lineup-they could all be solid pro players in certain roles, but I don't think any will be stars. Of course, one of them could fall in the draft to like the Spurs or something and do real well in the right system.

Masters, eh?

Popular posts from this blog

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...