Skip to main content

Al Wilson gone (?)

Well, that sucks.

While I don't like trusting "sources", apparently Al Wilson will be released by the Denver Broncos very soon. (I don't want to trust ESPN's source, that is-mine was Pugs.)

The Broncos tried trading Wilson to the Giants a few weeks back. I didn't want to say anything about it until the trade was official. By the time I learned it was, it wasn't-Wilson had already failed his physical. I guess the Broncos just decided to cut the middleman and Wilson in one fell swoop.

I don't get it. Wilson suffered a scary injury against Seattle in week 13 last season, but returned for the next three games. (He missed the last game against San Francisco with a sore back.) Like everyone, he's getting older. But even if he's not a superstar now, he's worth having on the roster-especially this roster, which doesn't have any worthy replacements on it. (Wilson outlasted his one-time successor, Terry Pierce, by a year.)

More to the point, Wilson's been an absolute rock in the middle of the defense for years. It was 1999 when Wilson was drafted and started stealing local headlines with his play in goal-line drills. Crazy how things turned out. I thought the Broncos were reloading with picks like Wilson following back-to-back Super Bowl wins. Instead, they were hit and miss over the next few years. Wilson indeed became a worthy member of the franchise's proud linebacker history, but the team only won one playoff game in his years here. Instead, he made play after gutsy play for a series of borderline playoff teams. It's also worth noting that Wilson missed only three games in eight seasons.

(I also remember one reader telling me after the draft that Wilson was too short to succeed-just want you to know that I remembered.)

Recently, his rough-and-tumble game has been the perfect complement to the outside speed of Ian Gold and D.J. Williams. Oh, and he takes the entire defense out to dinner every week. I wish I knew the real reason why the team is so anxious to get rid of him. John Clayton suggests it's a salary cap move:
With a $5.2 million salary and a $600,000 roster bonus, Wilson didn't fit into the Broncos salary cap after a busy offseason. His release will save the Broncos $1.63 million.

That's ridiculous. I don't even know how the Broncos are that close to the spending limit, considering how much the cap increased this offseason. Maybe it's because they gave a backup tight end $30 million? I like Daniel Graham, and I hope he lives up to his potential, but come on-Wilson already has.

One last thought: two years before taking Wilson at the bottom of the first round, the Broncos took Trevor Pryce with their No. 1 selection. Pryce was cut before last season. The Broncos blamed the cap, which made about as much sense then as it does now. Pryce joined the Baltimore Ravens and racked up 13 sacks last year. Dr. Z of Sports Illustrated even named Pryce to his All-Pro team. Does the same fate await Wilson? As long as he doesn't join the Raiders, I can only hope it does.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The Raider picked up Romo when we were finished with him, why not Wilson, this would be a good time to start building a team with Jamarcus and Wilson still has a lot of talent
John said…
A sad day for the Broncos . . . Wilson has been a stalwart member of the team, and I can't believe we are cutting him so we could outbid the Seahawks for Daniel Graham's services. Now our defense is really screwed.
David said…
character matters.

when will they realize that.

he was a real leader, you can't put a price on that.

however, it is curious to note that he couldn't pass a physical. makes me wonder if he really is damaged goods.

still, he deserves a shot here before being forced to move on.
John said…
Amen, Pugs, especially if all we save by cutting him is $1.63 mill . . . chump change by today's NFL standards.
Anonymous said…
That $1.63 will get us a sweet special teamer or 4th or 5th round rookie--what do we need the pride of our Defense for?

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...