Skip to main content

Checking In...

Last night the Nuggets won the Northwest Division with a 110-98 win over the Portland Trailblazers.

The article calls it the Nuggets’ first division title in eighteen years, which is just ridiculous. Anyway, I’m thrilled, so we’re going back to the Hole Punch Vault to see what went right and what didn’t this season.

First things first. I did say the Nuggets would win the division title, and I’m pointing that out because my recent predictions that the Broncos and University of Connecticut’s mens basketball team would win championships have whittled down my readership. (I also predicted a record of 54-28. That seems unlikely, as the Nuggets would not only have to win out, but also win half a dozen games they’ve already lost.)

What went right: Frontcourt depth. Nene injured his knee in the first game and was lost for the season and Kenyon Martin has been in and out of the lineup. And Ed Najera is gone now. But the Nuggets pieced together a decent inside corps thanks to a surprisingly more consistent Francisco Elson, an amazing start by Marcus Camby, and, of course, Carmelo’s maturation.

What went wrong: Earl Watson. I thought we signed him because we actually wanted him, but it turned out he really was just trade bait like everyone else said. I guess this actually went right because we did trade him.

What went right: Carmelo. My prediction (ahem):

I think Carmelo will have a fantastic season and score in the mid-twenties per game, in addition to regaining his rookie year late-game mojo. He won't be a stopper defensively, nor will we ask him to be, but expect him to play hard enough to earn big minutes.
Carmelo did indeed raise his scoring average to a current 26.8 per game. Even more impressively, he’s continued the efficiency he showcased at the end of last season with career-highs in field goal (48.2%) and free-throw (80.7%) shooting. And if you’ve watched a Nuggets game lately, you’ve surely heard that his late-game shooting percentages are among the league’s best (actually, I think they’ve said he is the league’s best), placing him in stark contrast to classmate LeBron James. Carmelo probably deserves cursory MVP consideration, if only because of how the offense stagnates when he’s on the bench. And he’s averaging 37 minutes per game.

What went wrong: Outside shooting. We’re dead-last in three-point percentage.

What went right: The trade that brought us Ruben Patterson and Reggie Evans.

I gave us the slight edge when it happened, but Kiki deserves serious props because it turned out to provide a major boost. It didn’t get the publicity, but forget what you’ve heard-it worked out fifty times better than when the Broncos signed all those Cleveland Browns.

Outlook: Maybe the biggest factor in the division title, of course, was the rest of our pathetic division, from which we will likely be the only playoff team. This puts us in an interesting playoff position. As a division winner, we’re automatically a top-three seed (we’ll be No. 3), but have a chance to finish with a worse record than the sixth seed, meaning we wouldn’t even have homecourt advantage in the first round.

Anyway, the sixth seed will probably be the Memphis Grizzlies or Los Angeles Clippers. Statistically, both look to have a little bit of an edge on us. But I think the Nuggets’ situation is somewhat analogous to that of the Pittsburgh Steelers this year-because of injuries and, in our case, trades, the team is better than its numbers and record would indicate.

We can beat either team. We’d even have an outside shot against the Suns in the second round. Either way, while the Nuggets may not look like they’ve made the huge leap I’d predicted, they continue to become one of the league’s elite teams.

Comments

David said…
i don't have much to say on this, other than it was a fantastic read and i endorse your position on the nuggets.

that's why i come here.

and for the liberal beratement, albeit employed ardently.

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...