Skip to main content

Do you know Shawn Moreno?

Today, I think, was the first time I appreciated how much pressure there is in making decisions in the NFL draft. For starters, there is the sheer amount of decisions to be made. Do we keep the pick? Do we trade it? Do we draft this guy, that guy, or this other guy? Do we go for offense or defense? Can we afford his likely contract demands? If we trade this for a pick next year, where do we think that pick will fall? Do we draft based on need, or do we take the best player we think is available? (I do not think there is a universal right answer to that last question, by the way.)

More frighteningly, there are so many important factors which are basically unknown. I doubt I could do it. Personally, if I’m making a decision, I analyze it to death, find out everything I possibly can, and then try to avoid making it. But the quite simple fact of the matter is that it’s impossible to know, or even be all that sure about, how any individual decision will work out.

Take, for instance, a simple move the Broncos made today. They started today holding the Chicago Bears’ first-round pick in next year’s draft from the Jay Cutler trade. They moved it to Seattle for the fifth pick of this year’s draft, no. 37 overall. Now on the face of it, moving a pick down just five spots to get it a year early is a pretty stellar move. But if Alphonso Smith, a 5-9 cornerback from Wake Forest, gets hurt, or is too slow, or is lazy, or receives poor coaching (on this team? Ha!), or otherwise doesn’t pan out, then the move was the wrong move, and the team is that much closer to getting literally nothing, rather than a more figurative nothing, for Cutler. If he’s the next Champ Bailey, then it was a brilliant move. If he’s the next Terrell Buckley, then he’ll play for fifteen teams, and even play well for some of them, but maybe not for us so we didn’t really get “value” for the pick. The point is, you just can’t know.

However, you CAN know that drafting a running back with the no. 12 pick, on a team with a horrific defense, a new pass-minded head coach, and frankly the best RBs coach in the business, a guy who can make diamonds out of anything, is probably not that savvy of a move. Even if Moreno turns out all right, would we have really needed him to?

Let’s check in with the Boy Wonder:

‘We went through a lot of backs last year,’ McDaniels said. ‘We only had three healthy backs at the minicamp last weekend. Again, we still got the defensive football player at 18 that we were hoping to get at 18, and we got them.’

Did he really just suggest we spent a first-round pick on a position because we need more bodies for camps? And while I think you can never be too sure of your haul on draft day, coach seems pretty confident.

The Broncos could have taken Ayers or another coveted defensive end/outside linebacker, Brian Orakpo, at No. 12 and hoped Moreno would have been around at No. 18. But McDaniels said he was hearing too much inside information about teams picking between them — perhaps New Orleans at No. 14 or San Diego at No. 16 — who were considering Moreno.

‘The way that it fell it just made all the sense in the world for us to go ahead and take him at 12 and not deal with: ‘Well we'll hold our breath or try to move up from 18 into the middle, between 12 and 18 to get him,' ’ McDaniels said. ‘The two players we really valued right there at that spot were Ayers and Knowshon.’

Comments

DG said…
What is it with us Gores and decision-making? Seriously . . . it's an embarrassment. I mean, I don't know how my wife lives with me . . . I over-analyze decisions . . . then inevitably think I've made the wrong one . . . then worry about why I did that . . . then wonder if I can correct it . . . and why didn't I just make a good decision? Ahh, it's unforgivable.

It's nice to know from your tone that you're rooting for Shanahan.
blaine said…
I was puzzled by the Bronco's draft as well. For all the different backs they had last year they still averaged 4.8 yards per carry as a team, which is pretty good. I would have to assume that since Dennison is still with the team that the zone blocking system will still be in place right? And, even if Moreno turns out to be the next Clinton Portis, won't the Broncos just trade him anyway?
John said…
The NFL Rules of Competition limit a team's regular season roster to 53 players. Miraculously, the Broncos have accumulated a total of 97 running backs heading into training camp. The only explanation I can think of is that Pat Bowlen is poised to announce the hiring of Fisher DeBerry as offensive coordinator, and a return to the wishbone.

I have to say that I called this: Orakpo still being on the board, and McDaniels drafting a running back at No. 12. I was literally sitting in front of the tv chanting "O-rak-po, O-rak-po," when I knew I would get screwed again. And we Gores may be bad at decisionmaking, but even my 16 month-old son was smart enough to yell "NOOOO!" when we picked Moreno. (Of course, he was just imitating his father.)

Tellingly, even Dan Snyder - the NFL's worst owner outside Oakland, and a double-whammy failure in both sports and business management - knew the pick was obvious. I have never seen a quicker pick than when the Redskins chose Orakpo in the ten seconds they were on the clock at pick 13.

Come to think of it, the Redskins may have been the luckiest team in the draft - they were unable to trade up to draft Sanchez, and then Orakpo fell into their lap at 13. Not bad for a team with only one first-day pick and historically incompetent management.

Of course a running back is a horrible pick in the first round for a team that turns retreads into Pro Bowlers as well as the Broncos. But a first-round running back pick makes no sense for any team (at least in the top 20 picks) due to the short shelf life and inclination to injury at the position.

And so what if someone else had taken Moreno? Was he appreciably better than whatever running back we could have gotten (i.e., any other in the draft) at pick 18?
Mike said…
DG: glad that sentence stood out. But yeah.

Blaine: I don't know what kind of scheme the Broncos are really going to have next year, and I'm assuming the status of some of the coaches, such as Dennison, is still in limbo, but I don't know. I mean Dennison was Shanny's right-hand guy. If the Broncos can trade Moreno for the next Champ that would be fine by me.

John: The thought of Joseph going all Darth Vader on the TV cracks me up briefly before reality comes crashing back down. How sweet would it have been to come out of the draft with two No. 1 DEs to complement Elvis Dumervil? I don't know if it would have changed things in a hurry but it would have been a great foundation. Good Fisher DeBerry joke, though, assuming it was a joke and not another premonition.

I think some RBs make sense as No. 1s...Barry Sanders, Walter Payton...but they are few and far between. It's sort of like taking a high school baseball player that early...occasionally you'll have a Griffey available that everyone knows will be a long-term stud, but generally it's not a wise move.
John said…
2 great DEs would have been perfect - and we could have had both Orakpo and Ayers, and still drafted LeSean McCoy, a solid running back who went to the Eagles, in the second round. It was almost like the draft class was so weak at running back we got excited by getting the best overall player at the position.

I also am hoping the Fisher DeBerry thing is not a premonition . .
David V said…
Why trade Cutler for first round picks when you dont want additional first round picks. Broncos are in a sad sad place right now.

Popular posts from this blog

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...