Skip to main content

The Broncos and the Patriots

The Denver Broncos destroyed the Kansas City Chiefs yesterday, 41-7. Jay Cutler was absolutely on fire: 20-for-27, 244 yards, four touchdowns, no interceptions. I'm almost surprised that seven of his passes hit the ground, because he was hitting on everything from short-drops to back-foot tosses down the seams.

I hate games like this late in the season, that tease with terrific performances. Too bad it'll be nine months before we see if there's any real carryover. Brandon Marshall, who's been good all year, went over a thousand yards receiving, and broke tackles like he always does. If he and Javon Walker are healthy next year, and Cutler plays well out of the gate, this is easily a playoff team, right? But then you remember that we lost by two touchdowns to Oakland last week, and the future looks much less clear.

The Patriots, on the other hand, passed their second major test of the season with flying colors, beating the Pittsburgh Steelers 34-13. Don't let the score deceive you: the Steelers are a very good team. But no one looks too good when the Patriots are primed.

Tom Brady, who should have already received this year's MVP trophy, threw for 399 yards and four touchdowns. ESPN.com has him on pace for 5,040 passing yards, 55 touchdowns, and six picks, which is insane.

The Patriots are now 13-0, which puts them just over two-thirds of the way to a perfect season, counting the playoffs. They're clearly the class of the league, so it's easy to say they should go 19-0, especially considering their remaining regular season games are against substandard competition.

But I think that marginalizes what a great accomplishment a perfect season would be. The last team to make a run like this was the 1998 Broncos, who hit 13-0 with a comeback win over Kansas City, when John Elway went over 400 yards and Shannon Sharpe ended his self-imposed week of silence with the game-winning touchdown catch.

(This was after the first game against the Chiefs, a game which was one of the finest moments of Shannon Sharpe's career. Late in a 30-7 Broncos victory, Sharpe goaded Derrick Thomas into three personal fouls on a late drive. The most memorable were Thomas grabbing Sharpe's face mask and swinging him around really blatantly. Never really found out what Sharpe was saying, but it must have been good. Anyway, for some reason he was quiet that whole week.)

Anyway, the Broncos looked unstoppable but lost their next two games, first to the Giants and then to the Dolphins, to finish at 14-2.

Coincidentally enough, the Patriots' schedule closes with games against the Jets, Dolphins, and Giants. (The nearly-perfect Broncos team beat the Jets in the AFC Championship that year.) More significantly, the Jets seemed to ignite New England's run by catching them cheating in Week One this year.

And then there's Miami. The Dolphins are the only franchise ever to go undefeated (in 1972), and they ended the 1985 Chicago Bears' quest for an undefeated season in a famous Monday night game. It would be fascinating if Miami, which is currently winless, beat New England to end the Patriots' run in two weeks. (Of course, unlike this year's team, the '85 and '98 Dolphins had Dan Marino.) I hate the '72 Dolphins, but that would be kind of a cool story. I can't tell you that the Patriots will trip up, but going undefeated is a huge and difficult accomplishment. Despite the competition, it's still going to be very impressive if New England wins out.

Comments

blaine said…
Seeing the Broncos play that well yesterday makes me wonder why they haven't been able to put together some better performances earlier in the year. Granted, it was against the Chiefs who are struggling this year, but yesterday it looked like there was a whole different team on the field. Is there a problem with motivation? Could Shanahan be doing a better job? It was only one game, but it did reveal that the Broncos have a lot of talent that doesn't seem to playing up to it's potential every week.

The Patriots are clearly the best team in the league this year, and the title is theirs for the taking. I've heard many people say they think the Patriots are the best team ever. I don't think that is true. The Patriots are dominating an extremely mediocre NFL this year. I do think they are an amazing football team, but I think the fact that so many teams have been so disappointing this year must be taken into consideration as well. Think of how many teams have been disappointments this year: Denver, Baltimore, Cincinnati, San Diego, Philadelphia, Chicago, Carolina, and New Orleans. The Colts haven't been healthy all year, and it's unlikely they will have all their starters for the playoffs. The Cowboys might be good, but the only "good" team they have beat this year are the Packers so who can be sure how good they really are? I can't remember the last time we had so many teams that were suppose to be title contenders that have played so poorly throughout the year.
Mike said…
Yeah, that Broncos game has been bugging me. After last night, I'm not even sure it really happened.

Anyway, I have no idea if it's a motivation issue or what. Part of it's inconsistency, some of which is due to young players, especially Jay Cutler, and injuries, like to Javon Walker, who was probably our best offensive player last year. Plus Champ Bailey's not as good as last year, though I think that says more about how amazing he was in 2006.

I completely agree that the Patriots are doing great in a year with little real competition. That's a great point. (New England has played pretty tough teams in Pittsburgh and Indy, though.) I don't think they're the best team ever, but if they go 19-0, they're definitely better than the '72 Dolphins.

Popular posts from this blog

The Mitchell Report

It came out today, and you may have already looked at it. If not, you can download it as a pdf all over the place, including from ESPN.com . Anyway, the big name named in it was Roger Clemens. That's what we've been waiting all this time for? I don't even know what to say, because this is like the least-surprising report of all time. I hate the gotcha crap that goes on when stuff like this happens. You know, the know-it-alls who say how obvious it was that Clemens had been cheating for years—hey, just look at his age! (Did these people say this so confidently  before Clemens was named? No. And have they ever heard of Nolan Ryan?) But seriously. He's huge, he put really big numbers for a really long time, and he's considered this super-intense jerk—basically, he's Barry Bonds on the mound. Setting aside the moral issues of steroid use (and believe me, I'm against it), I was hoping for some entertainment out of today's revelations, and I was sorely dis...

The Top Dozen Pro Quarterbacks

With the NFL season over, it’s time for year two of my annual quarterback rankings . Actually, last year the list was of quarterbacks I’d take over Jake Plummer. Since such a list this year would be at least a novella, I’ve changed it to the top twelve quarterbacks. This list is intended to be the best quarterbacks as of today and/or next season. Thus, it won’t correspond perfectly with, say, my list of the best young quarterbacks . Vince Young’s completion percentage, for example, will count against him more here. That said, some predictions are still involved. (For example, will Jake Delhomme and Ben Roethlisberger bounce back?) The winners: 12. Philip Rivers, San Diego. Rivers may deserve a higher spot on this list. I’m just trying not to get too carried away. On the plus side, he’s on a fine team (if they have coaches next year) and has a fantastic arm. On the downside, he’s young and was nothing special in the playoffs. So there’s a chance he won’t be quite so good next year, tho...

Who cares?

So we finally got done with the NBA playoffs after nearly two months of stretched-out play, and tomorrow's the draft. I really couldn't care less. I'm so burned out on the sport. Sadly, there's nothing else going on worth mentioning, so we might as well get into it. (Yes, baseball, Pugs, but I haven't really started following that this year yet, sorry.) Would the NFL hold its draft five days after the Super Bowl? Of course not, and not just because the league doesn't want to distract from the highlight of its annual calendar, the Pro Bowl. Of course, the NBA's situation is a little different. College play ended two and a half months ago, and the teams want to get draftees ready for the all-important summer league play (because the kind of guys that need the summer league always end up players). Not that when college basketball is over is relevant, anyway-the league is overrun by a bunch of high school players "just months removed from their prom" (...