Skip to main content

That was fast.

Michael Vick has plead guilty to a conspiracy charge (I think), and will be sentenced December 10. The prosecutors have recommended that Vick serve 12 to 18 months in prison, though the judge can sentence him for up to five years.

So, faster than anyone thought, it's just about all wrapped up. I, for one, am shocked. Who could have guessed that the people who found the "cute" in "electrocuting dogs" wouldn't always have Vick's back?

The question now is, where do we go for high-quality dogfighting? No, I mean, it's: will Vick play in the NFL again?

I don't think the answer is anywhere near a clear-cut "no", yet there are some reasons to think that he won't. For one, any team that signs a quarterback fresh out of prison is going to take a gigantic PR hit. And the offense is one that's surprisingly (to me, anyway) galvanizing. I mean, some people are losing their minds over this. Don't get me wrong. Torturing animals should offend anyone, but some athletes have been let off the hook for much more serious offenses. (Take Leonard Little, for instance.) I wonder, though. Are the people who would be completely turned off by Vick and swear off supporting a team forever the same people who love the NFL in the first place? I don't know. Any team that signs Vick will get negative press, but I'm not sure how bad their losses will really be at the box office.

Vick does have one factor going for him, and I think it's the deciding factor: his age. Though he's been a public figure for nearly a decade, Vick's only 27. If his sentence falls somewhere in the middle of the prosecutors' recommendation, he could come out of prison as a 29-year-old, free agent, proven-winner NFL quarterback. Yes, he'll have had a couple years away from the game, but Vick was never what you'd call "heady" to begin with. And he'll have had two years away from the wear-and-tear of the NFL. Don't you think someone would find a place for him?

I think he'll probably only get offers from teams like the Lions or Browns, though. I mean, some awful team, whoever that is in a couple years, will roll the dice. (Who knows what the Lions and Browns will be like in two years? Well, I do. They'll suck. But they won't get Vick.)

In other words...how can I put this...in 2009 or 2010, Broncos fans can expect to start seeing Michael Vick twice a season.

Comments

John said…
I actually was not surprised that Vick pled out to these charges, what with 7 cooperating witnesses ready to testify against him and a trail of physical evidence all the way up and down the East Coast. Plus, pleading now saves him the most amount of money (in legal fees), gives him the best chance to play football again (by cutting the process off as short as possible), and helps him enter a path to "redemption."

I agree that the uproar over dogfighting is a little strange. I mean, what about what Ray Lewis did?

I do think Vick will play again - he is young enough, will probably be allowed back into the league by 2010, and will have time not only away from the punishment of the NFL but to lift weights at taxpayer expense.

I originally thought he might have to go to Canada or the Arena League at first, but your prediction about the Raiders is spot-on. He will fit in perfectly with Al Davis's penchant for washed-up has beens with nothing left in the tank. And I don't think the PR hit will be as great as it would be if a team was letting him play now (especially for the Raiders) - by the time he gets out of prison, serves another year or so on league suspension, and does some PSA's about the evils of dog fighting, public sentiment may be that he has paid his debt to society. And we'll all be even more sick of PETA by then.

Where can we go for quality dogfighting? Just ask Deion Sanders.
Mike said…
I guess what I meant to say is that from the time the allegations first became public, everything moved really quickly. With everyone having rolled on him, though, at this point I'm also not surprised he didn't want to go to trial.

The other funny thing to me is how Vick's apology tried to frame his problems as an issue of maturity. Say what? I never went through a "make animals fight to the death" stage when I was younger, and I don't know anyone who did. I don't necessarily think Vick's mentally ill or anything like that, but I also never looked at this and thought: "Hmmm, why hasn't he grown out of this yet?"
John said…
That's a good point about maturity. I never went through a stage where I thought tormenting other living creatures was entertaining, but then again I never counted among the ranks of Trails West's BD program.

I think the real problem with Vick is that he has no real moral sense because no one has ever held him accountable before, so I guess that is a form of immaturity.

In any event, I can't believe anyone is feigning surprise that an alum of the Virginia Tech football program and the brother of Marcus Vick is a common street thug . . .
Mike said…
BD? You have to jog my memory on that.
John said…
BD = Behavior Development. Just think the Carwin family.

Popular posts from this blog

The NFL hates you.

It's no joke. It seems like the more devoted of a fan you are, the less the league cares about your continued patronage. The best example is the league's blackout policy, a wonderful gift from the league to its teams granting them added market pressure to charge whatever ridiculous amount they want for tickets. If a game doesn't sell out, the home market doesn't get to watch it on TV. (Basically, a 75-mile radius around the stadium doesn't get to see the game on TV if all the tickets aren’t bought first.) The NFL, like a needy girlfriend, says, "Hey, fans, you like us? Prove it." Then the league asks us to prove it again and again, week after week, year after year. I live within 75 miles of what should be John Elway Stadium, but Broncos fans are pretty much shielded from this stuff, right? Not all of them. One of my friends is as supportive a fan as the NFL can have: he's a Broncos season ticket holder and an NFL Sunday Ticket subscriber. That mean...

An innocent mistake

Sorry. Here I am to catch up on a few things from the past week... 1. Vince Young will be on the cover of Madden 08. Good for him, I guess. Much is made of the Madden curse. It's not a self-fulfilling prophecy, but it almost feels like one. The real problem is that a) football is a very violent game, and b) Electronic Arts typically selects a cover athlete who's already very well-known. Unfortunately, the players are therefore often a year (Shaun Alexander) or more (Ray Lewis) off their actual prime, and old enough that a serious injury is more likely. Young is an up-and-comer, and to avoid a horrible pun let's just say he has less age than most of those guys. I think he'll be fine. 2. Of course, the reason EA went with such a youthful player is that superstar Chargers back LaDainian Tomlinson turned them down . Why? Money. No surprise that'd be a point of contention, considering how "generous" EA is with its regular employees . 3. That's why re...

Super Bowl XLVI revealed!

The Patriots and the Giants. Things just work out sometimes. * * * Two new teams, the England Patriots and the York Giants, will play for the NFL title in Super Bowl Forty-Six in two weeks. I can't wait. The matchup comes too late, and after too imperfect of a season, to make up for the wounds inflicted by the Giants in early 2008. The Patriots' undefeated season, a 16-0 masterpiece in which they set the league's single-season scoring record, broke at the hands of the upstart Giants in that year's Super Bowl. The way the Giants won made their win feel especially flukish...Eli Manning, known more for his entitled attitude than his athleticism (the only player to which his moves have ever been compared favorably is his brother Peyton), somehow scrambled free of a Patriot pass rush in the closing minutes, and lofted a pass down the middle of the field to David Tyree, who caught the key throw against the top of his helmet. Then a touchdown pass to Plexiglass provided the wi...