Skip to main content

Seahawks at Bears preview

The NFL has thoughtfully given me two fantastic playoff games Sunday to snap me out of my Earl of Boykins funk.

The first is Seahawks at Bears (Sunday, 11 a.m., FOX). Seattle, of course, barely squeaked by Dallas last week after that botched hold by Dallas QB Tony Romo. Some have asserted that Romo dropped the ball because it was one of the special untouched “kicking” footballs. To which I say: no kidding. The whole point of the kicking footballs was to make field goals more difficult. The slick ball didn’t make a successful try impossible, but it had the effect it was designed to have.

Anyway, who cares about the losers? The Seahawks did some good things last week but, frankly, were unimpressive. Shaun Alexander was back to his playoff ways with a 2.9 yards-per-carry average, though he made some key conversions. It’s clear that Matt Hasselbeck has to carry this offense, and he connected on a mere fifty percent of his passes last week.

The Bears, though, are hardly better at quarterback. They’re just better everywhere else. There are some stats I bring up all the time, and this will be no exception: the Bears outscored Seattle and gave up fewer points. With Devin Hester fielding punts and kicks, you have to give them the edge on special teams, too.

So really, the only way the Bears can lose is with one of those 1.3 or 0.0 rating games out of quarterback Rex Grossman. The real disaster, though, would be bringing in backup Brian Griese, which would immediately seal Chicago’s fate. Griese’s lack of playing time is a huge reason Bears coach Lovie Smith has impressed me so much this year. He knows Grossman’s not a great option, but he also knows that the Bears have no other choice. When the backup has come in this year, he’s played like, well, Brian Griese. If you like a passing game that advances the ball in two- and three-yard chunks, then gives it up with spectacular 79-yard interception returns, Griese’s your man. Otherwise, you have to go with Grossman.

But Chicago really won’t need much from its offense considering how well the defense has played and considering how shaky Hasselbeck still is. (Hasselbeck’s got guts, no question, but he looks like he came back too soon.) And the Seahawks will have to be a pass-first, second, and third team. Chicago’s defense, though not quite Baltimore-quality, excels against the pass. Grossman may eventually cost them rings, but not this week. Chicago wins.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five mini-columns

In this in-between time at the start of football and late-but-not-that-late in the everlasting baseball season, there's not any one topic that stands out, so I thought I'd give you my well thought out opinions on five things in sports (originally ten, but I let No. 3 run so long that I thought I'd cut it short (having now finished this, I realize the word short is out of place here)). This probably means I'll have nothing to write about for weeks, so enjoy. Keep in mind that a) I came up with this list at 2 a.m. this morning (I couldn't sleep and I'm not kidding; you have no idea the kind of pressure that comes with running this website) and b) I'm still not making any money off this, so if it makes no sense, blame yourself (which, interestingly enough, also makes no sense). And we're off! 1) Maurice Clarett vs. Ohio State: Before you skip down to No. 2, which I would certainly do in your position, hear me out. There is actually a little timeliness to t...

And now that it’s gone, it’s like it wasn’t there at all

I never thought this blog would last longer than Jay Cutler's career with the Denver Broncos. He was a talented young prospect so good that the Broncos, a powerhouse organization only one game removed from the Super Bowl the season before, traded up to get him—or, in other words, a player whose upside was so huge, the team sacrificed its present to get his future. And now? He's gone . How did it come to this? * * * Often I'll play devil's advocate with a move like this; you know, I'll try and explain how it makes sense from the other side of the table. Today, during the most disastrous Broncos offseason in memory—and the draft hasn't even happened yet, so settle in—I just don't have it in me. I don't think move is really defensible from a football standpoint. But what the heck: as the article above says, the Broncos are sending Cutler and a fifth-round draft pick this month to the Chicago Bears for quarterback Kyle Orton, Chicago's first-rounder in t...

Did CU ever win the Pac-12?

In 2010, I bet a college buddy of mine (who longtime readers may remember as the only other contributor to Hole Punch Sports) that CU’s football team would not win the Pac-12 in the next 15 years. Guess what? It’s time for me to gloat, because I was right. Why we were doomed Back in the day, a lot of people made the argument that CU should join the Pac-12 because we’d get so much more TV money there. Of course, given college football is the answer to the question, “what if you had a sport where multiple teams were like the Yankees, and you created a whole universe of haves and have-nots?”, then yeah, you want to be aligned with some of the haves. But the question in my mind wasn’t, “will CU be better off with more money?” That’s an obvious yes. The question I asked was, will CU be any more competitive in their own conference if they’re competing against teams who are also getting more money? I couldn’t see why they would be. The mathematical angle Legend has it that Cowboys runn...